Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket


Questions and Answers

Status: Closed


Time-dependent NEGF

In the time-dependent NEGF equation, given a sigma_in(t,t’) due to the dot, I am getting an I-V equation that is making it difficult for me to group terms. For instance, looking at the analogue of the first term of I = 2q/hbar. int dE TrGin I get I1 = q/ihbar. int dt1 TrSigma_in.G^dagger-G.Sigma_in

Now, because of the different order of the time arguments in the G and G^dagger terms, I cannot pool these to write it as a spectral function A = i(G-G^dagger). Similarly, I can’t seem to take Sigma – Sigma^dagger to get Gamma. Is this correct?

Report abuse

Chosen Answer

  1. 0 Dislike

    Supriyo Datta

    I think I(t,t) should be real except for numerical errors ..

    We can write

    I_L(t,t) = (1/i/hbar) int dt1 TraceSigin_LG+-GSigin_L

    = (1/i/hbar) int dt1 sum(i,j) Sigin_L (i,j;t,t1) G+(j,i;t1,t) – G(i,j;t,t1) sigin_L+(j,i;t1,t) = (1/i/hbar) int dt1 sum(i,j) Sigin_L (i,j;t,t1) G(i,j;t,t1)* – G(i,j;t,t1) sigin_L(i,j;t,t1)* =(1/i) * (X – X*) = Real.

    In the first step I made use of sigin_L = sigin_L+ and in the second step I made use of A+(i,j;t,t1) = A(j,i;t1,t)*

    Makes sense?

    Reply Report abuse

    Please login to answer the question.

0 Responses

No other responses made., a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.