Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 10
Total Simulation Users Served: 4,378
Rank by Contributions: 108 / 1447
First Contribution: 08 Aug 2008
Last Contribution: 27 Jan 2010
Citations on Contributions: 8
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 476 users served in 77 courses from 15 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Resonant Tunneling Diode Simulation with NEGF 348 2,839 1,838 18,847 2 05 Sep 2008
2 1D Heterostructure Tool 386 2,078 1,968 13,117 7 04 Sep 2008
3 Piece-Wise Constant Potential Barriers Tool 310 4,838 1,211 18,045 - 08 Aug 2008
TOTAL 965 9,755 4,378 50,009
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 20: NEGF in a Quasi-1D Formulation Online Presentations 165 808 - 27 Jan 2010
2 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 09: Open 1D Systems - Reflection at and Transmission over 1 Step Online Presentations 262 860 - 25 Jan 2010
3 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 11: Open 1D Systems - The Transfer Matrix Method Online Presentations 157 824 - 31 Dec 2009
4 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 10: Open 1D Systems - Transmission through & over 1 Barrier Online Presentations 134 729 - 31 Dec 2009
5 Comparison of PCPBT Lab and Periodic Potential Lab Online Presentations 44 187 - 10 Aug 2009
6 Resonant Tunneling Diode Simulation with NEGF: First-Time User Guide Teaching Materials 100 618 - 01 Jun 2009
7 Piece-Wise Constant Potential Barriers Tool: First-Time User Guide Teaching Materials 60 165 - 01 Jun 2009
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.