Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 15
Total Simulation Users Served: 1,650
Rank by Contributions: 74 / 1447
First Contribution: 13 Mar 2007
Last Contribution: 02 Jul 2012
Citations on Contributions: 5
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 321 users served in 17 courses from 5 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Measuring Youngs Modulus - 0 - 0 - 02 Jul 2012
2 Modeling Thermal Interaction between Laser Light and AFM 31 70 105 251 - 02 Jul 2012
3 Capacitance Modeling Tool Using Schwarz-Christoffel Mapping 34 101 115 332 - 26 Jan 2011
4 SugarAid ECE202 3 8 95 1,302 - 23 Aug 2010
5 Comb Drive Levitation 6 17 54 124 - 06 Apr 2010
6 SugarCube 25 110 160 666 4 09 Mar 2010
7 SugarAid Thermodynamics 26 61 179 4,452 - 02 Feb 2010
8 Sugaraid 0 0 172 11,490 1 14 Sep 2009
9 SUGARCube - ADXL Accelerometer 17 43 114 452 - 27 May 2009
10 SUGARCube - Chevron Thermal Actuator 5 21 74 291 - 04 May 2009
11 SUGARCube - Netlist Input Tool 9 23 91 240 - 29 Jan 2009
12 MEMS Resonator - Tang 15 22 131 394 - 29 Jan 2009
13 SUGARCube - Cantilever 148 543 957 3,419 - 03 Oct 2008
TOTAL 275 1,019 1,650 23,413
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 SUGAR: the SPICE for MEMS Online Presentations 71 1,455 - 21 May 2007
2 Toward Improving the Precision of Nanoscale Force-Displacement Measurements Online Presentations 105 839 - 13 Mar 2007
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.