Please help us continue to improve nanoHUB operation and service by completing our survey - http://bit.ly/nH-survey14. Thank you - we appreciate your time. close

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 33
Total Simulation Users Served: 433
Total "and more" Users Served: 1,960
Rank by Contributions: 44 / 1484
First Contribution: 28 Dec 2005
Last Contribution: 11 Nov 2014
Citations on Contributions: -
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 34 users served in 3 courses from 1 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 MOSFET Simulation 158 792 158 792 - 23 Apr 2014
2 Convolution Tool 7 25 37 223 - 02 Aug 2012
3 Passive Filter Circuits 8 17 31 98 - 31 Jul 2012
4 Function Discovery Tool 13 50 134 1,014 - 24 Jul 2012
5 Normal Distribution 10 28 104 779 - 29 Aug 2011
TOTAL 189 912 433 2,906
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Development and Validation of a Nano Size and Scale Instrument (NSSI) Papers - - - 11 Nov 2014
2 Work-in-Progress: First-Year Engineering Students' Self-Reported Knowledge of Nanotechnology – The Development of a Coding Scheme Papers - - - 11 Nov 2014
3 Framework for Evaluating Simulations: Analysis of Student Developed Interactive Computer Tools Papers 1 1 - 22 Jul 2014
4 Sample Assessment Rubric Teaching Materials 11 11 - 17 Jun 2014
5 Sample Memo to Introduce Students to the Projects Teaching Materials 8 8 - 17 Jun 2014
6 First-Year Engineering Students' Communication of Nanotechnology Size & Scale in a Design Challenge Papers 7 7 - 22 Apr 2014
7 High Quality Mathematical Model Solutions Animations 16 19 - 29 Jul 2013
8 Problem Formulation & Problem Identification Animations 3 5 - 29 Jul 2013
9 Mathematical Models & Model Development Process Animations 19 19 - 29 Jul 2013
10 NanoRoughness MEA - Day 3 Training Presentation Materials 1 1 - 29 Jul 2013
11 NanoRoughness MEA - Day 2 Training Presentation Materials 1 1 - 29 Jul 2013
12 NanoRoughness MEA - Grading Materials Teaching Materials 1 3 - 29 Jul 2013
13 Nano Roughness MEA - Day 1 Training Presentation Materials 1 1 - 29 Jul 2013
14 NanoRoughness MEA - Training Materials Teaching Materials 1 2 - 29 Jul 2013
15 NanoRoughness MEA - Teaching Materials Teaching Materials 39 40 - 29 Jul 2013
16 Introduction to NanoRoughness MEA - Sandpaper Acitivity Teaching Materials 10 11 - 29 Jul 2013
17 Introduction to MEAs - Soccer Ball MEA Teaching Materials 9 10 - 29 Jul 2013
18 Case Studies: First-Year Engineering Nanotechnology-based Design Projects Papers 56 95 - 04 Jul 2013
19 First-Year Engineering Students\' Learning of Nanotechnology through an Open-Ended Project Papers 537 618 - 04 Jul 2013
20 First-Year Engineering Students Explore Nanotechnology in Engineering Papers 174 238 - 04 Jul 2013
21 Exploring the Impact of nanoHUB.org on Research and Education Users Online Presentations 10 32 - 15 Sep 2011
22 Success Criteria for Establishing a Thriving HUBzero Based Site: A Model for Science 2.0 Online Presentations 23 50 - 15 Sep 2011
23 Thinking about Learning Objectives Presentation Materials 23 142 - 07 Apr 2010
24 Backward Design for Instruction Presentation Materials 10 135 - 07 Apr 2010
25 How People Learn 101: Theory and Practice Presentation Materials 19 127 - 07 Apr 2010
26 NCN Simulation-based Learning Workshop - Participant Packet Presentation Materials 13 77 - 11 Nov 2009
27 Mark Ratner Interview on Nanotechnology Online Presentations 2 520 - 23 Mar 2006
28 Embedding science and technology education into students' lifestyles and technology choices Online Presentations 0 0 - 28 Dec 2005
TOTAL 919 1,960
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.