Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 14
Total Simulation Users Served: 7,207
Rank by Contributions: 79 / 1455
First Contribution: 12 Nov 2005
Last Contribution: 26 Mar 2013
Citations on Contributions: 58
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 3,324 users served in 330 courses from 40 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Brillouin Zone Viewer 71 449 252 900 2 15 Apr 2011
2 Resonant Tunneling Diode Simulation with NEGF 331 2,811 1,844 18,989 2 05 Sep 2008
3 1D Heterostructure Tool 362 1,993 1,987 13,256 7 04 Sep 2008
4 Crystal Viewer Tool 1,058 10,467 6,454 59,004 3 11 Jan 2008
5 Band Structure Lab 541 5,117 6,081 96,492 38 19 May 2006
6 Quantum Dot Lab 0 0 0 0 14 12 Nov 2005
TOTAL 2,558 20,837 7,207 188,641
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Empirical Tight-binding Parameterization of SmSe in the sp3d5f7s* model Downloads 76 103 - 26 Mar 2013
2 NEMO5 Latest Version Source Downloads 58 145 - 19 Mar 2013
3 Tight Binding Parameters by DFT mapping Presentation Materials 94 170 - 12 Sep 2012
4 NEMO5 Tutorials (2012 Summer School) Courses 1,733 3,005 - 19 Jul 2012
5 NEMO5 Tutorial 6A: Device Simulation - Transport (Double Gate) Online Presentations 200 379 - 18 Jul 2012
6 NEMO5 Overview Presentation Online Presentations 304 605 - 17 Jul 2012
7 Nonequilibrium Green’s functions theory: Transport and optical gain in THz quantum cascade lasers Online Presentations 60 321 - 26 Mar 2010
8 Quantum transport in semiconductor nanostructures Publications 371 1,692 1 04 Mar 2010
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.