Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 13
Total Simulation Users Served: 24
Rank by Contributions: 85 / 1472
First Contribution: 20 Jun 2013
Last Contribution: 02 Jul 2013
Citations on Contributions: -
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 [Illinois]: Posterior target probability given single-sensory input (delta rule) 0 0 5 26 - 02 Jul 2013
2 [Illinois]: Posterior probability of a target given single-sensory input (Bayes') 0 0 5 14 - 01 Jul 2013
3 [Illinois]: Posterior probability of a target given input for two senses (Bayes') 1 1 6 28 - 01 Jul 2013
4 [Illinois]: Posterior probability of a target given input for two senses (delta) 1 2 3 6 - 01 Jul 2013
5 [Illinois]: Posterior probabilities of hypothetical fish classes 1 2 6 26 - 01 Jul 2013
6 [Illinois]: Fish classification using back-propagation 2 5 6 12 - 01 Jul 2013
7 [Illinois]: Sigmoidal unit training with the delta rule 0 0 3 8 - 27 Jun 2013
8 [Illinois]: Predictor-corrector simulation of parabigeminal nucleus neural responses 2 3 6 29 - 26 Jun 2013
9 [Illinois]: Midbrain dopamine neuron responses to temporal-difference learning 1 3 6 90 - 26 Jun 2013
10 [Illinois]: Velocity storage and leakage 5 8 11 44 - 21 Jun 2013
11 Locust-flight central pattern generator 2 5 4 28 - 20 Jun 2013
12 Two-unit oculomotor integrator 0 0 3 30 - 20 Jun 2013
13 [Illinois]: Two leaky integrators in series 3 6 7 90 - 20 Jun 2013
TOTAL 15 35 24 431
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
No data found.
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.