Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 10
Total Simulation Users Served: 5,030
Rank by Contributions: 107 / 1569
First Contribution: 08 Aug 2008
Last Contribution: 27 Jan 2010
Citations on Contributions: 9
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 725 users served in 96 courses from 15 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Resonant Tunneling Diode Simulation with NEGF 274 2,404 2,085 20,634 3 05 Sep 2008
2 1D Heterostructure Tool 350 2,315 2,263 15,172 7 04 Sep 2008
3 Piece-Wise Constant Potential Barriers Tool 202 2,854 1,397 20,210 - 08 Aug 2008
TOTAL 759 7,573 5,030 56,016
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 20: NEGF in a Quasi-1D Formulation Online Presentations 136 957 - 27 Jan 2010
2 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 09: Open 1D Systems - Reflection at and Transmission over 1 Step Online Presentations 164 1,042 - 25 Jan 2010
3 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 11: Open 1D Systems - The Transfer Matrix Method Online Presentations 143 982 - 31 Dec 2009
4 Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 10: Open 1D Systems - Transmission through & over 1 Barrier Online Presentations 80 824 - 31 Dec 2009
5 Comparison of PCPBT Lab and Periodic Potential Lab Online Presentations 46 245 - 10 Aug 2009
6 Resonant Tunneling Diode Simulation with NEGF: First-Time User Guide Teaching Materials 76 713 - 01 Jun 2009
7 Piece-Wise Constant Potential Barriers Tool: First-Time User Guide Teaching Materials 51 229 - 01 Jun 2009
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.