On Monday July 6th, the nanoHUB will be intermittently unavailable due to scheduled maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. close

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 15
Total Simulation Users Served: 1,842
Total "and more" Users Served: 2,264
Rank by Contributions: 79 / 1560
First Contribution: 13 Mar 2007
Last Contribution: 02 Jul 2012
Citations on Contributions: 5
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 349 users served in 22 courses from 5 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Measuring Youngs Modulus - 0 - 0 - 02 Jul 2012
2 Modeling Thermal Interaction between Laser Light and AFM 8 19 110 255 - 02 Jul 2012
3 Capacitance Modeling Tool Using Schwarz-Christoffel Mapping 34 72 147 394 - 26 Jan 2011
4 SugarAid ECE202 2 3 97 1,240 - 23 Aug 2010
5 Comb Drive Levitation 5 12 59 130 - 06 Apr 2010
6 SugarCube 23 136 181 780 4 09 Mar 2010
7 SugarAid Thermodynamics 8 20 186 4,396 - 02 Feb 2010
8 Sugaraid 2 4 172 11,325 1 14 Sep 2009
9 SUGARCube - ADXL Accelerometer 9 94 122 505 - 27 May 2009
10 SUGARCube - Chevron Thermal Actuator 8 39 81 257 - 04 May 2009
11 SUGARCube - Netlist Input Tool 12 43 102 279 - 29 Jan 2009
12 MEMS Resonator - Tang 19 47 150 405 - 29 Jan 2009
13 SUGARCube - Cantilever 126 511 1,079 3,890 - 03 Oct 2008
TOTAL 209 1,000 1,842 23,856
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 SUGAR: the SPICE for MEMS Online Presentations 51 1,519 - 21 May 2007
2 Toward Improving the Precision of Nanoscale Force-Displacement Measurements Online Presentations 156 1,013 - 13 Mar 2007
TOTAL 204 2,264
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.