Please help us continue to improve nanoHUB operation and service by completing our survey - http://bit.ly/nH-survey14. Thank you - we appreciate your time. close

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 10
Total Simulation Users Served: 4,161
Total "and more" Users Served: 11,070
Rank by Contributions: 105 / 1484
First Contribution: 22 Nov 2005
Last Contribution: 23 Oct 2013
Citations on Contributions: 3
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 3,971 users served in 71 courses from 12 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Tensile Mechanics of alpha-Helical Polypeptides 6 111 15 221 - 23 Oct 2013
2 TRANSpull: computes pulling coupled to transport properties of single molecules. 9 141 25 551 - 08 Sep 2011
3 MOLpull: A tool for molecular free energy reconstruction along a pulling coordinate 8 113 27 2,057 1 04 Jan 2011
4 Coarse Grain Lipid Simulator 10 38 143 691 - 09 Jul 2009
5 Nanosphere Optics Lab Field Simulator 113 838 919 8,676 1 22 Jan 2008
6 PNP Cyclic Peptide Ion Channel Model 12 390 212 1,404 - 04 Apr 2007
7 Nanosphere Optics Lab 518 8,751 6,252 97,415 2 31 May 2006
TOTAL 606 10,382 4,161 111,015
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Optical and Thermodynamic properties of noble metal nanoparticles. Effect of chemical functionalization. Teaching Materials 26 248 - 06 May 2009
2 Theoretical Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles Teaching Materials 1,554 10,338 - 06 May 2009
3 Quantum Chemistry Part II Online Presentations 20 611 - 22 Nov 2005
TOTAL 1,587 11,070
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.