Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 13
Total Simulation Users Served: 8,646
Rank by Contributions: 90 / 1595
First Contribution: 12 Nov 2005
Last Contribution: 26 Mar 2013
Citations on Contributions: 59
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 2,640 users served in 307 courses from 35 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 Brillouin Zone Viewer 174 836 417 1,641 2 15 Apr 2011
2 Resonant Tunneling Diode Simulation with NEGF 284 2,474 2,093 20,704 3 05 Sep 2008
3 1D Heterostructure Tool 371 2,411 2,282 15,268 7 04 Sep 2008
4 Band Structure Lab 596 6,443 6,525 102,113 38 19 May 2006
5 Quantum Dot Lab 490 3,945 5,448 62,431 14 12 Nov 2005
TOTAL 1,839 16,109 8,646 202,157
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Empirical Tight-binding Parameterization of SmSe in the sp3d5f7s* model Downloads 100 222 - 26 Mar 2013
2 NEMO5 Latest Version Source Downloads 177 266 - 19 Mar 2013
3 Tight Binding Parameters by DFT mapping Presentation Materials 86 270 - 12 Sep 2012
4 NEMO5 Tutorials (2012 Summer School) Courses 1,745 4,958 - 19 Jul 2012
5 NEMO5 Tutorial 6A: Device Simulation - Transport (Double Gate) Online Presentations 181 581 - 18 Jul 2012
6 NEMO5 Overview Presentation Online Presentations 222 859 - 17 Jul 2012
7 Nonequilibrium Green’s functions theory: Transport and optical gain in THz quantum cascade lasers Online Presentations 54 388 - 26 Mar 2010
8 Quantum transport in semiconductor nanostructures Papers 390 2,121 1 04 Mar 2010
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.