Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 14
Total Simulation Users Served: 11,873
Total "and more" Users Served: 1,644
Rank by Contributions: 82 / 1499
First Contribution: 09 Feb 2006
Last Contribution: 23 Feb 2011
Citations on Contributions: 277
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 4,113 users served in 306 courses from 38 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 FETToy 365 6,709 3,352 60,558 57 23 Feb 2011
2 QuaMC2D 30 537 504 8,580 2 24 Feb 2007
3 CNTFET Lab 209 18,322 1,643 174,689 9 09 Feb 2007
4 NanoFET 106 6,925 1,041 50,774 7 09 Feb 2007
5 NanoMOS 198 3,462 2,450 42,187 100 19 May 2006
6 MOSCap 735 6,245 4,869 47,374 2 06 Apr 2006
7 MOSFet 676 11,478 5,139 76,836 6 30 Mar 2006
8 Schred 276 5,451 2,710 87,640 120 09 Feb 2006
TOTAL 1,879 59,129 11,873 548,638
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Why QuaMC 2D and Particle-Based Device Simulators? Online Presentations 30 183 - 13 May 2008
2 Examples for QuaMC 2D particle-based device Simulator Tool Online Presentations 14 194 - 12 May 2008
3 Modeling Coulomb Effects in Nanoscale Devices Online Presentations 13 119 - 28 Apr 2008
4 Particle-Based Device Simulators Description Online Presentations 87 350 1 28 Apr 2008
5 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D—Part II: Applications Papers 107 595 1 14 Jan 2008
6 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D: Part I − Models and Benchmarks Papers 70 524 - 14 Jan 2008
TOTAL 297 1,644
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.