Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Usage

Usage is calculated on the last day of every month. For more information on usage data, visit the Usage Overview page.

Table 1: Overview
Item Value
Contributions: 14
Total Simulation Users Served: 11,230
Total "and more" Users Served: 1,549
Rank by Contributions: 77 / 1461
First Contribution: 09 Feb 2006
Last Contribution: 23 Feb 2011
Citations on Contributions: 276
Usage in Courses/Classrooms: 3,893 users served in 293 courses from 38 institutions
Table 2: Simulation Tool Usage
# Tool Name Users served in last 12 months Simulation Runs in last 12 months Total users served Total Simulation Runs Citations Published On
1 FETToy 345 7,108 3,263 58,910 57 23 Feb 2011
2 QuaMC2D 37 948 500 8,549 2 24 Feb 2007
3 CNTFET Lab 199 43,747 1,572 171,866 8 09 Feb 2007
4 NanoFET 92 7,328 1,010 50,152 7 09 Feb 2007
5 NanoMOS 223 3,168 2,413 41,244 100 19 May 2006
6 MOSCap 770 7,400 4,583 45,216 2 06 Apr 2006
7 MOSFet 668 9,300 4,872 72,087 6 30 Mar 2006
8 Schred 246 5,745 2,621 85,802 120 09 Feb 2006
TOTAL 1,904 84,744 11,230 533,826
Table 3: "and more" Usage
# Resource Title Users served in last 12 months Total users served Citations Published On
1 Why QuaMC 2D and Particle-Based Device Simulators? Online Presentations 33 177 - 13 May 2008
2 Examples for QuaMC 2D particle-based device Simulator Tool Online Presentations 23 192 - 12 May 2008
3 Modeling Coulomb Effects in Nanoscale Devices Online Presentations 10 116 - 28 Apr 2008
4 Particle-Based Device Simulators Description Online Presentations 82 313 1 28 Apr 2008
5 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D—Part II: Applications Publications 103 562 1 14 Jan 2008
6 Atomistic Simulation of Realistically Sized Nanodevices Using NEMO 3-D: Part I − Models and Benchmarks Publications 80 503 - 14 Jan 2008
TOTAL 306 1,549
* Total only includes versions of the tools this author contributed to.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.