Find information on common issues.
Ask questions and find answers from other users.
Suggest a new site feature or improvement.
Check on status of your tickets.
Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›
Learn more ›
4769 users, detailed usage
3981 users in 36 classes
(Ask a question)
(Add a new wish)
Share this resource:
By Baudilio Tejerina
Quantum Chemistry Lab: Ab Initio and DFT molecular and electronic structure calculations of small molecules
You must login before you can run this tool.
Version 3.0 - published on 19 Jan 2010
doi:10.4231/D3JM23F80 cite this
This tool is closed source.
View All Supporting Documents
No results found.
Powered by ...
Write a review
@ 02:05 PM on 25 Oct, 2011
1.0 out of 5 stars
has potential but crashes and freezes every 2 seconds which makes this program completely unbearable to use.
Report abuse |
@ 02:23 PM
on 25 Oct, 2011
Dear Anonymous: I would like to help with the problems you are experiencing using QC-Lab. Can you describe the molecular system you are studying? It frequently happens that users tend to push the limits of the computational engine behind the user interface and that brings about the hanging. Unfortunately, there is no easy way to prevent that from happening or, to warn the user before hand. In other instances, the computer facility at the NCN is at a peak of use, namely during a class or a homework: many people using it at the same time. Regards, Baudilio
@ 05:58 PM on 23 Oct, 2011
I cannot handle the multitude of problems that QC-lab throws at my face. I have literally spent 4 hours watching the program either not respond or crash completely. When I type, QC-Lab just decides to not respond to my commands. My friend, who is also using this program beside me, has witnessed it crash or result in error, setting him back on a project with a restricted deadline. I literally had to hold him back to keep him from strangling the nearest small animal.
@ 06:26 PM
on 23 Oct, 2011
Dear Anonymous: I am really sorry for your frustration. It has also happened to me, many times, that the “program/interface/computational engine” combination has given me a hard time. It usually happens that we (users) cannot predict whether the molecular system we want to calculate is too big for the available resources so, the program just crashes or, even worse, it hangs with no message about the problem. If you could share with me what type of molecules you are trying to study, (size: number of atoms. basis set and theoretical level: HF, MP2, or DFT), I’d be glad to help you. Regards, Baudilio
@ 09:57 PM on 13 Mar, 2010
A terrible user interface and unexplainable crashes combined make this one of the most elaborate torture devices ever devised by man.
@ 10:19 PM
on 13 Mar, 2010
Dear ‘Anonymous’ user: Like yours, there have been many, many complaints about this tool. And I understand your frustration. Please believe me. Although I would -no body knows how much- I’d wish to improve the performance and its user-friendliness so that it could be gradually more and more useful to all. However, and very unfortunately, I have never received any constructive critic that I could use to do so. If you please be so kind to describe the problem(s) you’re undergoing, I may be able to help. Very respectfully, Baudilio Tejerina
@ 10:49 PM
on 13 Mar, 2010
Ah! Mr. Tejerina. First off, thank you very much for your reply. I’ve worked with a lot of programs by authors who rarely revise their work. I apologize for the lack of ‘construct’ in my initial criticism. My main complaint is the unexplained crashes the tool experiences. As the tool runs, I can see a brief flash of red text explaining the error, but once the tool finishes running, I can’t view the output log to see the error or how to correct it. After a few more attempts, without changing any of the inputs, it suddenly works, without explanation. The interface problem may be more to do with my specific assignment than your program, but it were easier to make side by side comparisons of different simulations, that would be extraordinarily useful. Again, I apologize for my first post. I should not have written it after a full afternoon’s struggling with this assignment and program. All frustration is directed at the program, not you, and I’m sorry that I was unconstructive. It is certainly a powerful tool, but difficult to use.
@ 10:55 PM
on 13 Mar, 2010
@ 02:45 PM
on 14 Mar, 2010
Thanks for the feedback. When a run crashes, the information passing by the screen is saved so one can analyze the causes and take the appropriate action to correct the problem. In the pull-down menu labeled “Result:” select the option “Incomplete RUN”. This contains the report of the job. At the bottom, you will find the reason of the crash. The message in red comes from the operating system and hardly ever helps. It’s the part (few lines) above that what will actually tell you what’s gone wrong. The fact that, for a given same simulation, the program sometimes runs some others doesn’t, it’s really weird. Regards, Baudilio PS: Please note that the program is limited by the size of the system you’re studying (number of atoms, basis functions, and Hamiltonian) and the computational resources available and provided by the NCN. There is no manual for this program (nor for any other) that teaches you about it this sort of issues better than your own experience.
@ 05:52 PM
on 14 Mar, 2010
Thank you for the help. It seems to be working much better today. What you said about a manual is interesting. A help file or tutorial is probably what this program needs more than anything. Perhaps the reason for all the complaints is because no one really knows how to use this program without a lot of experience.
@ 05:34 PM on 14 Jul, 2009
AWFUL! This program is from the stone age. It flashes every second! You can’t even minimize the thing because you lose half the screen.
@ 09:05 PM
on 14 Jul, 2009
I can’t agree more: I used to complain about the exact same issues myself “flashes every second” and “can’t minimize the screen” until I realized -actually I was told- that the problem was caused by the graphics card I had in my computer: it was from “the stone age”.
@ 04:44 PM on 24 Jan, 2008
Worst program ever. I have never used something so frustrating and poorly organized. The arrows stick all over the screen making it basically useless. I can’t believe I’m paying 50k a year to be forced to use this stupid website. Also, it crashes for no damn reason even after entering the correct coordinates that had JUST WORKED on the program. This is garbage.
@ 04:00 PM on 24 Jan, 2008
@ 09:21 PM on 23 Jan, 2008
@ 09:54 PM on 21 Jan, 2008
Utter and complete garbage.
@ 11:35 PM on 17 Jan, 2007
@ 06:08 PM on 17 Jan, 2007
@ 11:55 AM on 21 Oct, 2006
horrible. very poor directions, very slow, screen does not refresh itself so it gets covererd in arrows and you can not see the drop menues. very confusing.
@ 04:50 PM on 26 Feb, 2006
freezes too many times for me to count
@ 08:58 PM on 15 Feb, 2006
4.0 out of 5 stars
nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies.