Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Resources › Tools › Medici › Reviews
This resource has a 9.4 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 02 Jan, 2012
Users: 120
Jobs: 14280
Avg. exec. time: 2 mins
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE
Avg. Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars
Citations: 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Advanced
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

126 user(s), detailed usage

11 users in 10 class(es)

3 Citation(s)

3 questions (Ask a question)

2 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Medici

By Steven Clark

Purdue University

MEDICI (Synopsys)

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.3 - published on 27 Jul 2009

doi:10254/nanohub-r206.4 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Recommendations

No results found.

Powered by ...

Write a review Reviews

  1. 5.0 out of 5 stars

    YunSeop Yu

    No comment.

    Report abuse | Reply

  2. 4.0 out of 5 stars

    HALDUN KUFLUOGLU

    +1     0   Please login to vote.

    I often use Medici for my research work, it is an integral part of my toolset. Medici is good for classical device simulations and I can match experimental data quite well. However, for subthrehold operation, gate current, band-to-band tunneling and impact ionization, it is not very powerful, in my experience.

    Report abuse | Reply

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies.