To explore the potential of AM-AFM for high-resolution applications in air and liquids, we analyzed the imaging process of Q-controlled AM-AFM. Analytical as well as numerical approaches are applied to solve the equation of motion describing the cantilever dynamics with and without Q-Control in the presence of a model tip-sample interaction force. Based on this analysis, the characteristics of Q-controlled AM-AFM are compared to conventional AM-AFM carried out in amplitude modulation mode without active Q-Control (“tapping mode”) as well as to FM-AFM. Explicit consideration of tip-sample forces permits insight into the imaging properties of Q-controlled AM-AFM. It is found that an increased Q-factor prevents the oscillating cantilever to jump into a repulsive imaging regime during tip-sample approach, which often occurs during conventional tapping mode imaging in air. In addition, our analysis reveals which parts of the tip-sample force curve are contributing to contrast formation for the different imaging conditions. Based on these findings, we conclude that under ambient conditions, the restriction of the maximal tip-sample force to specific parts of the attractive regime, which is triggered by the activation of the Q-Control feedback, is the main reason for the enhanced imaging quality reported in several experimental studies in air if compared to conventional tapping mode imaging without Q-Control . Despite this improvement, atomic resolution might still not be achieved since the regime of short-ranged attractive forces might not be reached, i.e., forces might actually be too low. In contrast, it is the almost complete absence of an attractive interaction that causes the resolution deficits in liquids. Nonetheless, even in liquids repulsive forces can by greatly lowered by the application of Q-Control . Finally, we present a method that allows recovering the tip-sample interaction potential from the simultaneous measurement of amplitude-distance and phase-distance curves, allowing local force spectroscopy similar to the one only possible so far for FM-AFM in vacuum .
- T. Fukuma et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 034103; 86, 193108; 87, 034101 (2005).
- Y. Seo et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1860 (2003).
- D. Klinov and S. Maganov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2697 (2004).
- H. Hölscher, D. Ebeling, and U. D. Schwarz, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 084311 (2006).
- H. Hölscher and U. D. Schwarz, App. Phys. Lett. 89, 073117 (2006)
- H. Hölscher, Appl. Phys. Lett. (in press).
Researchers should cite this work as follows:
(2007), "SPMW A fresh look to amplitude-modulation AFM: Force minimization, interaction measurement, and the quest for high resolution," http://nanohub.org/resources/2208.
Burton Morgan Building, Room 121