Navigation

Support

Support Options

Knowledge Base

Find information on common issues.
Ask the Community

Ask questions and find answers from other users.
Wish List

Suggest a new site feature or improvement.
Support Tickets

Check on status of your tickets.

Submit a Support Ticket

Username: optional Name: required E-mail: required Please answer the question: required
Sharks live in... Please leave this field blank. required

Problem: required Attach a screenshot: optional (.jpg, .jpeg, .jpe, .bmp, .tif, .tiff, .png, .gif, .pdf, .zip, .mpg, .mpeg, .avi, .mov, .wmv, .asf, .asx, .ra, .rm, .txt, .rtf, .doc, .xls, .xlsx, .html, .js, .wav, .mp3, .eps, .ppt, .pptx, .pps, .swf, .tar, .tex, .gz, .dat, .docx, .xml, .m)

Home › Tools › MIT Photonic Bands › Wishlist

MIT Photonic Bands

By Carlos Montalvo¹, Minghao Qi², Jing Ouyang²

1. University of Texas at El Paso 2. Purdue University

Sompute the band structures and electromagnetic modes of periodic dielectric structures.

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0 - published on 24 Jul 2008

doi:10.4231/D31C1TF49 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

This resource has a 8.5 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 04 Mar 2015
Users:	496
Jobs:	7480
Avg. exec. time:	2 mins

Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review:	4.0 out of 5 stars
Citations:	0

Expert

Difficulty Level		Target Audience
	K-12	Middle/High School
	Easy	Freshmen/Sophomores
	Intermediate	Juniors/Seniors
	Advanced	Graduate Students
	Expert	PhD Experts

496 users, detailed usage

36 users in 6 classes

0 questions (Ask a question)

2 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (New Wish)

Wishlist

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.