Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

SUGARCube - Cantilever

Cantilever modeling and simulation with different loads

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0.1 - published on 31 Mar 2010

doi:10.4231/D3RV0D08D cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "SUGARCube - Cantilever" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

957

23 38 47 61 77 120 132 147 160 165 176 222 230 238 244 256 266 279 290 301 309 317 327 338 360 380 392 407 425 449 468 479 492 498 505 514 525 534 548 557 567 597 604 617 628 637 639 649 659 670 681 696 734 767 788 803 813 819 831 837 853 862 872 879 898 918 939 943 956 957

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 609 (63.57%)
Unidentified 246 (25.68%)
Industry 36 (3.76%)
National Lab 31 (3.24%)
Educational - Pre-College 16 (1.67%)
Unemployed 14 (1.46%)
Government Agency 5 (0.52%)
Educational - Unspec. Level 1 (0.1%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 294 (54.55%)
in INDIA 96 (17.81%)
pk PAKISTAN 26 (4.82%)
de GERMANY 21 (3.9%)
cn CHINA 20 (3.71%)
ru RUSSIAN FEDERATION 18 (3.34%)
co COLOMBIA 18 (3.34%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 17 (3.15%)
tw TAIWAN 15 (2.78%)
tr TURKEY 14 (2.6%)

Simulation Runs

3,419

86 127 205 248 302 496 540 582 601 615 653 785 807 831 843 875 905 946 971 993 1007 1020 1034 1054 1092 1146 1168 1203 1257 1406 1530 1581 1621 1634 1660 1681 1717 1761 1791 1813 1831 2100 2135 2216 2240 2271 2280 2300 2320 2338 2358 2384 2454 2711 2811 2834 2860 2876 2908 2920 2950 2965 3000 3009 3089 3221 3371 3380 3411 3419
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 3.87 hours 259.45 days
CPU time 3.92 seconds 1.75 hours
Interaction Time 31.46 minutes 35.13 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.