Please help us continue to improve nanoHUB operation and service by completing our survey - http://bit.ly/nH-survey14. Thank you - we appreciate your time. close

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Piece-Wise Constant Potential Barriers Tool

By Dragica Vasileska1, Gerhard Klimeck2, Xufeng Wang2, Samarth Agarwal3

1. Arizona State University 2. Purdue University 3. IBM

Transmission and the reflection coefficient of a five, seven, nine, eleven and 2n-segment piece-wise constant potential energy profile

Launch Tool

This tool version is unpublished and cannot be run. If you would like to have this version staged, you can put a request through HUB Support.

Archive Version 1.1.5
Published on 01 Apr 2009, unpublished on 01 Apr 2009
Latest version: 1.2.8. All versions

doi:10.4231/D3707WN5N cite this

This tool is closed source.

Category

Tools

Published on

Abstract

Detailed description of the physics that needs to be understood to correctly use this tool and interpret the results obtained, is provided in the reading materials listed below:


Open Systems Double-Barrier Case Explained


Exercises that illustrate the importance of quantum-mechanical reflections in state of the art devices and the resonance width dependence upon the geometry in the double-barrier structure that is integral part of resonant tunneling diodes are given below:


Quantum-Mechanical Reflections Quantum-Mechanical Reflections in Nanodevices Double-Barrier Structure


The formation of bands in periodic potentials and how the width and the number of the energy bands varies by varying the geometry of the n-well potential is illustrated via the following homework assignments:


From one well, to two wells, to five wells, to periodic potentials Bands as a function of the geometry of the n-well potential

One can also use this tool to calculate the transmission coefficient through barriers that are approximated with piece-wise constant segments.


Tunneling through triangual barrier encountered in Schottky contacts

One can also use this tool to test the validity of first-order and second order stationary perturbation theory.


Application of stationary perturbation theory example


Improvements / modifications in subsequent releases:

  1. 1.2 – the energy and transmission coefficent axis are exchanged, so the resonance peaks now line up with the spatial resonances in the barrier structure.
  1. 1.2 – bug-fix: transmission through a single barrier can be simulated now in the “n” barrier case. The code no longer provides an empty output.
  1. 1.2 – the adaptive energy refinement was improved through a different algorithm. The tool no longer utilizes the Matlab built-in adaptive integration routine but an adaptive resonance finding and grid refinement technique as used in the NEMO1D tool or the Resonant Tunneling Diode Tool.
  1. 1.2 – The single barrier case has been corrected and should be functional.
  1. 1.2 – The tool now has a progress update for the adaptive resonance finding.
  1. 1.4- The tool now has the tight-binding Green’s function based formalism built into it. This will enable the user to make a comparison between the Transfer matrix method and the single band tight-binding calculation.
  2. 1.5- spatially varying effective masses are introduced.

Tags

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.