Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Resources › Workshops › 2005 Oncological Sciences Center Symposium › About
This resource has a 6.5 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
Users: 1161
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0

0 users

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

2005 Oncological Sciences Center Symposium

View Workshop Series

Audio podcast
Video podcast
Slides/Notes podcast

See also

No results found.

Category Workshops
Abstract Progress and Problems in Cancer Treatment and Prevention
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • (2005), "2005 Oncological Sciences Center Symposium," http://nanohub.org/resources/512.
Time August 16, 2005
Location Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Tags
  1. cancer 1
  2. nano/bio 1
  3. nanomedicine 1

In This Workshop

  1. Testicular Cancer

    This resource has a 6.0 Ranking

    Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage data. Learn more ›

    Usage Stats
    Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
    Users: 212
    Reviews & Citations
    Google/IEEE
    Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
    Citations:

    20 Dec 2005 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): Stephen D. Williams

    …

  2. Multianalyte Approaches to Cancer Diagnosis

    This resource has a 5.9 Ranking

    Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage data. Learn more ›

    Usage Stats
    Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
    Users: 134
    Reviews & Citations
    Google/IEEE
    Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
    Citations:

    20 Dec 2005 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): George G. Klee

    …

  3. Sex, Drugs and A.L.L.: How Current Clinical Biomarkers and Therapeutic Agents Point to Future Opportunities in Childhood Leukemia Research

    This resource has a 5.6 Ranking

    Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage data. Learn more ›

    Usage Stats
    Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
    Users: 109
    Reviews & Citations
    Google/IEEE
    Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
    Citations:

    20 Dec 2005 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): Terry A. Vik

    …

  4. Therapeutic Agent Delivery

    This resource has a 5.6 Ranking

    Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage data. Learn more ›

    Usage Stats
    Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
    Users: 85
    Reviews & Citations
    Google/IEEE
    Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
    Citations:

    20 Dec 2005 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): Charles Erlichman

    …

  5. Ovarian Cancer: Progress and Challenge

    This resource has a 5.6 Ranking

    Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage data. Learn more ›

    Usage Stats
    Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
    Users: 103
    Reviews & Citations
    Google/IEEE
    Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
    Citations:

    20 Dec 2005 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): Daniela Matei

    …

  6. Translational Molecular Imaging

    This resource has a 6.8 Ranking

    Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage data. Learn more ›

    Usage Stats
    Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
    Users: 370
    Reviews & Citations
    Google/IEEE
    Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
    Citations:

    20 Dec 2005 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): Val J. Lowe

    …

  7. 2005 Oncological Sciences Center Symposium Agenda

    This resource has a 6.7 Ranking

    Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage data. Learn more ›

    Usage Stats
    Total: updated 01 Apr, 2012
    Users: 352
    Reviews & Citations
    Google/IEEE
    Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
    Citations:

    07 Dec 2006 | Downloads

  • Results 1 - 7 of 7
  • Start
  • 1
  • End

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies.