Friday morning October 31, nanoHUB tools and home directories will be unavailable from 6 AM to noon (eastern time); we're getting a new file server! All tool sessions will be lost. Also, the web site will be unavailable for about 15 minutes sometime between 8-9 AM.

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Illinois ECE 440 Solid State Electronic Devices, Lectures 8 and 9: Drift Mobility

By Eric Pop

Stanford University

Published on

Abstract

Carrier Mobility and Drift

ECE 440: Lectures 8-9
Carrier Mobility and Drift

Let’s recap the 5-6 major concepts so far:

Memorize a few things, but recognize many.
(why? semiconductors require lots of approximations)

Why all the fuss about the abstract concept of EF?
Consider (for example) joining an n-doped piece of Si with a p-doped piece of Ge. How does the band diagram look?

So far, we’ve learned the effects of temperature and doping on carrier concentrations.

But no electric field = not useful = boring materials.

The secret life of C-band electrons (or V-band holes): They are essentially free to move around at finite temperature & doping. So what do they do?

Instantaneous velocity given by thermal energy:

Scattering time (with what?) is of the order ~ 0.1 ps.

So average distance travelled between scattering: L ~

But on average, this electron goes: _________________
So turn ON an electric field:

F = ± qE

F = m*a  a =

Between collisions, carriers accelerate along E field:

vn(t) = ant = for electrons
vp(t) = apt = for holes

In the energy band picture this looks like:

On average, velocity is randomized again every

Credits

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ECE 440: Solid State Electronic Devices

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Eric Pop (2009), "Illinois ECE 440 Solid State Electronic Devices, Lectures 8 and 9: Drift Mobility," http://nanohub.org/resources/6094.

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.