Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › PhotonicsSHA-2D: Modeling of Single-Period Multilayer Optical Gratings and Metamaterials › Reviews
This resource has a 9.7 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 28 Jul 2014
Users: 452
Jobs: 3728
Avg. exec. time: 9 mins
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 10
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Advanced-Expert
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

452 users, detailed usage

2 users in 2 classes

10 Citation(s)

6 questions (Ask a question)

1 review(s) (Review this)

2 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

PhotonicsSHA-2D: Modeling of Single-Period Multilayer Optical Gratings and Metamaterials

By Xingjie Ni1, Zhengtong Liu1, Fan Gu1, Marcos Gabriel Pacheco2, Joshua Borneman1, Alexander V. Kildishev3

1. Purdue University 2. University of Texas at El Paso 3. Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

Frequency domain simulation of single-period multilayer gratings and optical metamaterials upon TE/TM plane-wave incidence at arbitrary angles

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 0.9.6 - published on 17 Feb 2012

doi:10.4231/D3WS8HK4X cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Reviews

Write a review

  1. 0 Like 0 Dislike

    Anonymous

    5.0 out of 5 stars

    Edit Reply Report abuse

    Please login to vote.

No classroom usage data was found. You may need to enable JavaScript to view this data.

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.