Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Nanostructured Optoelectronics Toolbox

By Ian Michael Rousseau1, Jeffrey C Grossman1, Vladimir Bulovic1, Polina Anikeeva2

1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Examine charge and exciton transport in nanostructured optoelectonic devices

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0.4 - published on 07 Mar 2012

doi:10.4231/D3CR5NB87 cite this

Open source: license | download

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Charge concentration profile Exciton concentration profile Build a device Specify the rates

Category

Tools

Published on

Abstract

Organic semiconductors, metal oxides, and nanomaterials hold promise as the future basis for efficient, cost-effective, large scale optoelectronic devices. This tool computes the transient and steady-state charge and exciton distributions in devices composed of a sequence of planar, distinct layers of semiconductor and nanostructured materials.

The model utilizes a rate equation formalism based upon the idea of hopping across a one-dimensional chain of atoms and molecules. In the limit of low field and a narrow, the model is equivalent to the drift-diffusion equations. The advantage of the rate equation formalism lies in its generalizability; various injection models, Foerster resonant energy transfer, interfacial recombination, and tunneling can be studied within this framework.

The accuracy of simulation results is subject to the approximations involved, so effects like percolation and self-trapping in three-dimensions are not included. The simulation is meant to serve as an educational tool to develop intuition and to provide back-of-the envelope estimations for researchers in the field of where charges and excitons build up in nanostructured optoelectronic devices. Any results should be checked with a full Monte Carlo transport model before publication.

Powered by

SciPy, Cython, C++, and the GNU Scientific Library

Credits

Polina Anikeeva, Jeff Grossman, Vladimir Bulovic, Alexi Arango, and Vanessa Wood

Sponsored by

ENI, The National Science Foundation

References

J. Nelson, J. Kirkpatrick, and P. Ravirajan. Factors limiting the efficiency of molecular photovoltaic devices. Physical Review B, 69 (3) 035337, Jan 2004. J. Staudigel, M. Stossel, F. Steuber, and J. Simmerer. A quantitative numerical model of multilayer vapor-deposited organic light emitting diodes. Journal of Applied Physics, 86 (7) 3895–3910, October 1, 1999 P. Peumans, A. Yakimov, and S. R. Forrest. Small molecular weight organic thin- film photodetectors and solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics, 93 (7) 3693–3723, April 1, 2003 2003. J. C. Scott and G. G. Malliaras. Charge injection and recombination at the metal-organic interface. Chemical Physics Letters, 299 (2) 115–119, 1/6 1999.

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Ian Michael Rousseau; Jeffrey C Grossman; Vladimir Bulovic; Polina Anikeeva (2012), "Nanostructured Optoelectronics Toolbox," http://nanohub.org/resources/qdotled. (DOI: 10.4231/D3CR5NB87).

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags

No classroom usage data was found. You may need to enable JavaScript to view this data.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.