Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 11: Open 1D Systems - The Transfer Matrix Method

By Gerhard Klimeck1, Dragica Vasileska2, Samarth Agarwal3, Parijat Sengupta3

1. Purdue University 2. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 3. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Published on

Abstract

The 1D time independent Schrödinger equation can be easily solved analytically in segments of constant potential energy through the matching of the wavefunction and its derivative at every interface at which there is a potential change. The previous lectures showed the process for a single step potential change and a single potential barrier which consts of two interfaces. The process can be generalized for an arbitrary number of interfaces with the transfer matrix approach. The transfer matrix approach enables the simple cascading of matrices through simple matrix multiplication.

The transfer matrix approach is analytically exact, and “arbitrary” heterostructures can apparently be handled through the discretization of potential changes. The approach appears to be quite appealing. However, the approach is inherently unstable for realistically extended devices which exhibit electrostatic band bending or include a large number of basis sets.

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Gerhard Klimeck; Dragica Vasileska; Samarth Agarwal; Parijat Sengupta (2009), "Nanoelectronic Modeling Lecture 11: Open 1D Systems - The Transfer Matrix Method," http://nanohub.org/resources/8097.

    BibTex | EndNote

Time

Location

Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Tags

No classroom usage data was found. You may need to enable JavaScript to view this data.

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.