Friday morning October 31, nanoHUB tools and home directories will be unavailable from 6 AM to noon (eastern time); we're getting a new file server! All tool sessions will be lost. Also, the web site will be unavailable for about 15 minutes sometime between 8-9 AM. close

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Overview of How People Learn Framework to Support Instructional Design

By Sean Brophy

Purdue University

Published on

Abstract

The National Academy of Sciences commissioned a report on How People Learn which is now being used by a wide range of educators and researchers. The report provides a review of critical research on human cognition that has informed the development of pedagogical methods that lead to learning. The report evaluated a large number of effective learning environments ranging from early childhood to adult education and identifies four central dimensions common to all of these. These dimensions include: knowledge, learners, assessment and community. This online presentation provides a brief overview of this framework and some of the characteristics that define each dimension. This framework is a method organizing an evaluation or design of a learning experiences that will result in high impact learning outcomes (impact in acquired knowledge, number of learning objectives, efficiency of instruction and quantity of learners participating in a learning experience).

Credits

J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cockings, eds., How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C (2000). http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6160 accessed April 2010.

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Sean Brophy (2010), "Overview of How People Learn Framework to Support Instructional Design," http://nanohub.org/resources/8874.

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.