Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home Tools Polymer Modeler Usage

Polymer Modeler

By Benjamin P Haley1, Nate Wilson1, Chunyu Li1, Andrea Arguelles, Eugenio Jaramillo, Alejandro Strachan1

1. Purdue University

Build thermoplastic polymer chains and run LAMMPS to relax the chains and study mechanical properties

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 3.19 - published on 02 Feb 2016

doi:10.4231/D34F1MK3R cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Polymer Modeler" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

784

5 7 22 36 39 39 42 45 50 57 69 74 82 96 103 114 120 128 141 148 154 164 172 184 193 201 217 224 234 244 253 266 290 296 308 315 320 335 350 361 372 380 397 408 416 422 426 437 447 457 473 500 514 585 601 617 631 637 644 656 674 689 704 724 741 773 784

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Unidentified 393 (50.06%)
Educational - University 334 (42.55%)
Industry 34 (4.33%)
National Lab 10 (1.27%)
Government Agency 8 (1.02%)
Educational - Pre-College 3 (0.38%)
Unemployed 2 (0.25%)
Military 1 (0.13%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 191 (64.97%)
in INDIA 42 (14.29%)
cn CHINA 11 (3.74%)
ru RUSSIAN FEDERATION 10 (3.4%)
de GERMANY 8 (2.72%)
fr FRANCE 7 (2.38%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 7 (2.38%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 6 (2.04%)
pl POLAND 6 (2.04%)
ca CANADA 6 (2.04%)

Simulation Runs

18,120

25 59 110 197 214 529 638 667 856 1314 1880 2116 2371 2551 3498 3886 4494 4573 4647 4690 4801 5279 5774 6127 6233 6315 6549 6722 6804 6870 7031 7073 7253 7493 7975 8642 8732 8953 9409 9599 9810 9968 10301 10508 10727 10876 10985 11101 11422 11702 12037 12462 12782 13050 13333 13040 13577 13977 14352 14656 14988 15388 15755 16059 17083 17396 18120
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 3.22 hours 1794.21 days
CPU time 7.03 minutes 65.27 days
Interaction Time 53.69 minutes 498.86 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.