Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Polymer Modeler

By Benjamin P Haley1, Nate Wilson1, Chunyu Li1, Andrea Arguelles, Eugenio Jaramillo, Alejandro Strachan1

1. Purdue University

Build thermoplastic polymer chains and run LAMMPS to relax the chains and study mechanical properties

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 3.11 - published on 03 Feb 2015

doi:10.4231/D3QR4NR5W cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Polymer Modeler" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

616

5 7 22 36 39 39 42 45 50 57 69 74 82 96 103 114 120 128 141 148 154 164 172 184 193 201 217 224 234 244 253 266 290 296 308 315 320 335 350 361 372 380 397 408 416 422 426 437 447 457 473 500 514 585 601 616

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 302 (48.95%)
Unidentified 262 (42.46%)
Industry 31 (5.02%)
Government Agency 8 (1.3%)
National Lab 8 (1.3%)
Educational - Pre-College 3 (0.49%)
Unemployed 2 (0.32%)
Military 1 (0.16%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 175 (65.3%)
in INDIA 40 (14.93%)
cn CHINA 9 (3.36%)
de GERMANY 8 (2.99%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 7 (2.61%)
ru RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7 (2.61%)
fr FRANCE 6 (2.24%)
pl POLAND 6 (2.24%)
co COLOMBIA 5 (1.87%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 5 (1.87%)

Simulation Runs

13,758

25 59 110 197 214 529 638 667 856 1314 1880 2116 2371 2551 3498 3886 4494 4573 4647 4690 4801 5279 5774 6127 6233 6315 6549 6722 6804 6870 7031 7073 7253 7493 7975 8642 8732 8953 9409 9599 9810 9968 10301 10508 10727 10876 10985 11101 11422 11702 12037 12462 12782 13050 13333 13758
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 2.7 hours 1164.73 days
CPU time 37.27 minutes 268.08 days
Interaction Time 49.06 minutes 352.89 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.