On Monday July 6th, the nanoHUB will be intermittently unavailable due to scheduled maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. close

# Support

## Support Options

• ### Knowledge Base

Find information on common issues.

• ### Wish List

Suggest a new site feature or improvement.

• ### Support Tickets

Check on status of your tickets.

## Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor - Questions &amp; Answers

Purdue University

#### Abstract

Welcome to the Question and Answer page for the online class Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor.

To ask a question related to the course, please direct your email to: . For other problems such as difficulties with the video streams, or other web related issues, please report them using the Report Problems web form.

Lecture 4: Charging/Coulomb Blockade, slide 6

Q: Why is the broadening in G vs Vg plot equal to "gamma + kT + 2*Uo ". My question is about the 2*Uo part. With your reasoning that the electronic level cannot raise its own energy by coulombic means it should end up being just Uo.

A: This is a somewhat subtle point - slide 6 refers to the limit when the broadening is large (far from the Coulomb blockade limit) - in this limit since gamma is large it is probably hard to tell experimentally whether the remainder is U0 or 2*U0 - so I am not sure if the answer is known experimentally.

Conceptually I am inclined to vote for 2*U0 for the following reason: A large broadening means that one could view the entire broadened level, not as two levels, but as a collection of 2N closely spaced levels with only (1/N) of each wavefunction residing on the dot (N is a very large number, say a thousand or a million). Filling up the entire broadened level adds 2N electrons to the entire system (dot + contact), but only two to the dot.

You are arguing that since there are only two electrons on the dot, each should feel the charging due to 2-1 = 1 electron. I would argue that we are adding 2N electrons to the system and each electron should feel the charging due to (1/N) of (2*N - 1) electrons which is = 2 - (1/N) ~ 2.

As I said, this is somewhat subtle, hard to convey by email...

#### Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

• Supriyo Datta (2005), "Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor - Questions & Answers," http://nanohub.org/resources/97.

### Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.