SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE - nanoHUB.org will be completely unavailable on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 from 7AM EST (12:00 UTC) to approximately 6PM EST (23:00 UTC) for significant hardware and software upgrades. Please plan accordingly and watch this space for further information. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Quantum and Semi-classical Electrostatics Simulation of SOI Trigates › Usage
This resource has a 10.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 09 Dec 2013
Users: 368
Jobs: 1042
Avg. exec. time: 2 mins
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Advanced
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

14 users, detailed usage

1 users in 1 classes

0 Citation(s)

1 question (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Quantum and Semi-classical Electrostatics Simulation of SOI Trigates

By Hyung-Seok Hahm1, Andres Godoy2

1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2. University of Granada, Spain

Generate quantum/semi-classical electrostatic simulation results for a simple Trigate structure

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 2.0.1 - published on 19 Oct 2009

doi:10.4231/D3513TV7P cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Recommendations

No results found.

Powered by ...

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Quantum and Semi-classical Electrostatics Simulation of SOI Trigates" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

368

26 49 60 73 83 88 99 112 118 125 134 141 148 151 155 160 163 166 167 171 177 179 183 186 192 199 200 203 205 209 211 216 222 227 231 236 241 243 248 253 255 258 262 267 271 275 277 284 288 295 297 305 306 309 312 315 317 321 324 334 336 341 347 349 352 356 359 363 366 368

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 303 (82.34%)
Unidentified 24 (6.52%)
Industry 22 (5.98%)
National Lab 8 (2.17%)
Educational - Pre-College 4 (1.09%)
Government Agency 3 (0.82%)
Unemployed 3 (0.82%)
Military 1 (0.27%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 107 (41.63%)
in INDIA 62 (24.12%)
tw TAIWAN 20 (7.78%)
cn CHINA 14 (5.45%)
bd BANGLADESH 12 (4.67%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 11 (4.28%)
de GERMANY 9 (3.5%)
it ITALY 8 (3.11%)
fr FRANCE 7 (2.72%)
ru RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7 (2.72%)

Simulation Runs

1,042

80 164 190 225 254 263 292 332 347 360 387 405 421 433 446 456 461 468 479 507 517 525 537 544 562 575 581 584 592 601 605 612 626 637 641 654 660 663 671 684 692 698 704 719 726 741 745 777 785 800 808 818 820 832 838 846 853 864 871 907 918 926 939 945 950 969 980 1002 1036 1042
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 2.99 hours 49.87 days
CPU time 1.78 minutes 11.88 hours
Interaction Time 44.31 minutes 12.31 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.