Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Meep

By Jing Ouyang1, Xufeng Wang1, Minghao Qi1

1. Purdue University

Finite-Difference Time-Domain Simulations

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 2.1.1 - published on 05 Aug 2014

doi:10.4231/D3BN9X392 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Meep" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

1,001

5 8 25 37 48 59 71 78 84 91 103 116 123 134 148 155 165 178 193 200 209 215 219 229 235 239 243 251 255 266 275 284 293 329 338 346 358 365 376 384 394 400 417 439 453 471 482 492 499 518 529 542 549 563 586 607 626 644 658 672 683 690 706 726 743 755 773 798 822 848 857 870 881 891 904 920 929 942 954 961 971 981 985 996 1,001

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 735 (73.35%)
Unidentified 185 (18.46%)
Industry 31 (3.09%)
National Lab 28 (2.79%)
Government Agency 9 (0.9%)
Unemployed 9 (0.9%)
Educational - Pre-College 4 (0.4%)
Military 1 (0.1%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 331 (53.47%)
cn CHINA 68 (10.99%)
in INDIA 64 (10.34%)
de GERMANY 34 (5.49%)
ca CANADA 25 (4.04%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 24 (3.88%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 23 (3.72%)
fr FRANCE 18 (2.91%)
ru RUSSIAN FEDERATION 17 (2.75%)
tw TAIWAN 15 (2.42%)

Simulation Runs

23,933

64 171 385 527 1025 1109 1187 1222 1427 1470 1528 1590 1618 1689 1784 1868 1923 2073 2232 2270 2302 2334 2346 2372 2390 2427 2449 2487 2499 2928 3240 3302 3366 3708 3895 3949 4007 4028 4071 4114 4160 4458 5546 5882 6238 6749 7130 7677 8009 8509 9005 9237 9291 9426 9492 9770 10101 10271 10427 10863 11631 12151 12583 13881 14379 14702 14810 15902 17359 18926 19103 19182 19489 19794 20520 21331 21559 21882 22079 22237 22839 23342 23521 23702 23933
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 3.1 hours 2577.79 days
CPU time 10.96 hours 9106.38 days
Interaction Time 1.08 hours 900 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.