All Purdue clusters (Coates, Rossmann, Hansen, Carter, and Conte) are scheduled for downtime on March 15 and 16, 2014. Tools that use these clusters will not execute simulations. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › MuGFET › Versions
This resource has a 10.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 12 Mar 2014
Users: 724
Jobs: 12011
Avg. exec. time: 17 mins
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 8
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Intermediate-Advanced
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

724 users, detailed usage

1 users in 1 classes

8 Citation(s)

15 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

MuGFET

Simulate the nanoscale multigate-FET structures (finFET and nanowire) using drift diffusion approaches

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.1.4 - published on 26 Nov 2012

doi:10.4231/D32V2C884 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Versions

Version Released DOI Handle Published
1.1.4 26 Nov 2012 doi:10.4231/D32V2C884 yes
1.1.3 11 Mar 2011 doi:10.4231/D38W3824V no
1.1.2 30 Jun 2010 doi:10.4231/D3154DP0M no
1.1.1 30 Oct 2009 doi:10.4231/D3JW86M71 no
1.1 24 Nov 2008 doi:10.4231/D34J09X0Q no
1.0 01 May 2008 doi:10.4231/D35Q4RK62 no

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.