Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Exciton Annihilation Simulator › Usage
This resource has a 0.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 10 Jul 2014
Users: 49
Jobs: 273
Avg. exec. time: 17 secs
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 1

4 users, detailed usage

1 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Exciton Annihilation Simulator

By Michael C. Heiber

University of Akron

Simulates exciton-exciton annihilation behavior of polymer semiconductors measured by pump-probe spectroscopy

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.1 - published on 10 Apr 2013

doi:10.4231/D3542J81H cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Exciton Annihilation Simulator" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

49

6 11 24 25 29 32 33 34 36 37 40 43 43 43 46 48 48 49

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 25 (51.02%)
Unidentified 21 (42.86%)
Government Agency 1 (2.04%)
Educational - Pre-College 1 (2.04%)
Industry 1 (2.04%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 9 (37.5%)
in INDIA 7 (29.17%)
sg SINGAPORE 1 (4.17%)
be BELGIUM 1 (4.17%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 1 (4.17%)
de GERMANY 1 (4.17%)
sa SAUDI ARABIA 1 (4.17%)
bd BANGLADESH 1 (4.17%)
tn TUNISIA 1 (4.17%)
cz CZECH REPUBLIC 1 (4.17%)

Simulation Runs

273

54 82 196 198 205 220 222 223 229 230 243 249 249 259 265 271 271 273
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 1.34 hours 8.52 days
CPU time 17.04 seconds 43.44 minutes
Interaction Time 19.58 minutes 2.08 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.