Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Brillouin Zone Viewer › Usage
This resource has a 7.3 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 18 Apr 2014
Users: 232
Jobs: 798
Avg. exec. time: 1 secs
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 2

29 users, detailed usage

13 users in 1 classes

2 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

1 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Brillouin Zone Viewer

Visualize Brillouin zones of different crystals and different unit cells

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.1 - published on 24 Mar 2014

doi:10.4231/D3DB7VQ35 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Brillouin Zone Viewer" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

232

21 28 35 44 52 61 67 68 74 80 84 91 99 104 108 112 117 121 123 128 132 137 159 162 167 171 177 182 187 191 195 201 207 212 219 227 232

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 153 (65.95%)
Unidentified 62 (26.72%)
National Lab 9 (3.88%)
Industry 5 (2.16%)
Educational - Pre-College 1 (0.43%)
Unemployed 1 (0.43%)
Government Agency 1 (0.43%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 60 (52.17%)
in INDIA 14 (12.17%)
de GERMANY 8 (6.96%)
br BRAZIL 7 (6.09%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 7 (6.09%)
bd BANGLADESH 5 (4.35%)
cn CHINA 5 (4.35%)
fr FRANCE 3 (2.61%)
tr TURKEY 3 (2.61%)
ro ROMANIA 3 (2.61%)

Simulation Runs

798

90 100 115 127 140 157 165 168 175 186 194 208 222 231 244 252 257 267 270 277 287 293 325 328 342 366 382 396 434 451 489 508 528 539 571 783 798
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 4.37 hours 60.78 days
CPU time 0.71 seconds 3.96 minutes
Interaction Time 53.67 minutes 12.45 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.