Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › CGTB › Usage
This resource has a 10.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 11 Jul 2014
Users: 329
Jobs: 972
Avg. exec. time: 34 secs
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Intermediate-Advanced
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

2 users, detailed usage

0 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

2 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

CGTB

By yang xu1, Narayan Aluru1

1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Compute the charge density distribution and potential variation inside a MOS structure

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1 - published on 15 May 2006

doi:10.4231/D3N29P61K cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "CGTB" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

329

1 10 16 24 29 38 46 57 63 67 79 87 97 106 111 116 125 134 140 143 151 155 157 161 163 169 172 172 174 177 180 180 186 191 195 197 199 200 202 205 205 206 207 207 209 210 212 213 214 217 219 222 224 229 230 231 234 236 239 239 240 243 245 245 247 249 250 252 255 256 258 259 259 259 260 262 262 264 264 265 268 272 274 276 293 293 293 294 294 295 296 296 297 297 297 309 327 329 329

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 231 (70.21%)
Unidentified 51 (15.5%)
Industry 24 (7.29%)
National Lab 15 (4.56%)
Educational - Pre-College 3 (0.91%)
Government Agency 2 (0.61%)
Unemployed 2 (0.61%)
Military 1 (0.3%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 117 (54.42%)
in INDIA 35 (16.28%)
tw TAIWAN 11 (5.12%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 10 (4.65%)
cn CHINA 10 (4.65%)
it ITALY 9 (4.19%)
fr FRANCE 7 (3.26%)
de GERMANY 6 (2.79%)
es SPAIN 5 (2.33%)
se SWEDEN 5 (2.33%)

Simulation Runs

972

4 42 66 82 94 124 143 168 182 193 213 231 254 283 300 328 341 362 375 380 400 411 422 429 434 448 452 452 456 469 480 480 489 499 512 517 523 525 530 539 539 543 547 547 551 559 565 566 571 580 584 589 592 599 602 605 608 613 625 625 626 632 635 635 642 646 649 657 665 669 673 676 676 677 679 684 689 691 691 693 698 706 713 717 786 786 786 788 788 790 791 791 793 793 793 853 968 972 972
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 1.97 hours 34.04 days
CPU time 33.57 seconds 3.87 hours
Interaction Time 17.12 minutes 4.93 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.