Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Resources › Tools › Composite Laminate Analysis › Usage
This resource has a 8.4 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 25 May 2013
Users: 111
Jobs: 1367
Avg. exec. time: 1 secs
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE: updated 22 Apr 2010
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Expert
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

4 users, detailed usage

28 users in 2 classes

0 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Composite Laminate Analysis

By Andrew Ritchey

Purdue University

Uses basic laminate theory to estimate effective laminate properties and residual stresses, strains and deformations due to thermal loading.

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.2 - published on 12 Apr 2010

doi:10.4231/D3QV3C37P cite this

Open source: license | code unavaialble

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Composite Laminate Analysis" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

111

2 17 20 21 22 26 29 32 35 37 38 40 42 43 63 66 66 66 69 71 71 75 78 80 82 84 91 94 95 95 96 98 100 103 105 105 105 106 107 110 111

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 97 (87.39%)
Unidentified 8 (7.21%)
Industry 4 (3.6%)
Military 1 (0.9%)
National Lab 1 (0.9%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 73 (76.04%)
in INDIA 8 (8.33%)
co COLOMBIA 3 (3.13%)
it ITALY 2 (2.08%)
br BRAZIL 2 (2.08%)
tr TURKEY 2 (2.08%)
ca CANADA 2 (2.08%)
tw TAIWAN 2 (2.08%)
fr FRANCE 1 (1.04%)
au AUSTRALIA 1 (1.04%)

Simulation Runs

1,367

27 146 172 253 264 275 291 306 331 337 338 342 351 356 668 705 708 717 745 776 789 816 847 860 867 871 934 948 961 969 1060 1150 1155 1251 1271 1271 1279 1289 1309 1356 1367
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 2.34 hours 75.5 days
CPU time 0.77 seconds 9.92 minutes
Interaction Time 55.65 minutes 29.95 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies.