Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › ElectroMat › Usage

ElectroMat

By Alexander Gavrilenko1, Heng Li2

1. Norfolk State University 2. Virgina State University

Kronig-Penney Potential

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.2 - published on 12 Oct 2014

doi:10.4231/D3TD9N87Z cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "ElectroMat" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

410

2 5 6 8 15 27 30 39 45 56 63 72 85 109 130 158 165 172 174 177 184 194 197 200 206 216 222 224 226 229 229 235 251 254 255 255 257 267 268 269 271 274 276 276 278 281 283 286 288 294 295 296 296 296 298 299 301 301 302 305 306 306 307 361 366 368 369 371 377 381 384 386 386 388 389 391 394 395 395 396 397 398 398 398 400 402 402 406 407 407 408 410 410 410 410 410 410

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 379 (92.44%)
Unidentified 15 (3.66%)
Industry 6 (1.46%)
National Lab 5 (1.22%)
Educational - Pre-College 4 (0.98%)
Unemployed 1 (0.24%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 237 (70.75%)
cz CZECH REPUBLIC 38 (11.34%)
in INDIA 18 (5.37%)
de GERMANY 10 (2.99%)
tw TAIWAN 7 (2.09%)
se SWEDEN 6 (1.79%)
ca CANADA 5 (1.49%)
cn CHINA 5 (1.49%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 5 (1.49%)
hr CROATIA 4 (1.19%)

Simulation Runs

2,861

7 18 65 95 124 162 174 207 225 269 295 327 459 789 892 1061 1081 1106 1113 1120 1154 1187 1207 1218 1229 1364 1405 1414 1416 1423 1423 1449 1582 1596 1597 1597 1616 1818 1819 1826 1831 1845 1850 1850 1852 1863 1869 1880 1885 2009 2015 2018 2018 2018 2032 2033 2036 2036 2044 2060 2062 2066 2080 2645 2663 2670 2672 2679 2702 2734 2750 2755 2755 2760 2764 2773 2781 2783 2783 2784 2785 2793 2793 2793 2801 2807 2818 2846 2851 2851 2853 2857 2861 2861 2861 2861 2861
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 51.45 minutes 72.14 days
CPU time 0.19 seconds 6.39 minutes
Interaction Time 16.4 minutes 22.99 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.