Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › GFET Tool › Usage
This resource has a 6.6 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 07 Mar 2014
Users: 372
Jobs: 2701
Avg. exec. time: 5 mins
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 2

45 users, detailed usage

2 users in 2 classes

2 Citation(s)

3 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

GFET Tool

By Eric Pop1, Feifei Lian1

1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Simulate the electrical and thermal properties of a graphene field-effect transistor.

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0 - published on 14 Jul 2011

doi:10.4231/D36M33379 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "GFET Tool" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

372

18 28 39 47 59 68 77 87 96 107 117 131 137 150 155 164 175 191 201 220 230 240 246 257 263 275 290 306 317 334 357 369 372

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 250 (67.2%)
Unidentified 102 (27.42%)
National Lab 7 (1.88%)
Industry 7 (1.88%)
Educational - Pre-College 3 (0.81%)
Unemployed 2 (0.54%)
Government Agency 1 (0.27%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 71 (33.97%)
in INDIA 57 (27.27%)
cn CHINA 19 (9.09%)
bd BANGLADESH 18 (8.61%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 14 (6.7%)
es SPAIN 8 (3.83%)
ir IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF 8 (3.83%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 5 (2.39%)
fr FRANCE 5 (2.39%)
hk HONG KONG 4 (1.91%)

Simulation Runs

2,701

148 171 243 267 293 319 341 416 692 793 879 948 1083 1124 1160 1382 1482 1576 1640 1726 1774 1836 1897 2059 2091 2151 2180 2255 2349 2423 2588 2695 2701
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 4.47 hours 282.04 days
CPU time 4.27 minutes 4.49 days
Interaction Time 1.08 hours 67.89 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.