Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Graphene Interconnect

By Sansiri Tanachutiwat1, wei wang2, Nicholas Anthony Connelly

1. College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA 2. CNSE, University at Albany

Estimate performances of graphene interconnects

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0.1 - published on 20 Oct 2009

doi:10.4231/D3BK16P5B cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Graphene Interconnect" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

582

15 23 38 49 60 66 72 82 90 97 107 116 123 129 134 146 155 160 162 167 175 188 200 207 211 217 224 227 242 252 268 276 283 296 300 313 317 323 329 338 348 352 356 361 370 380 386 390 396 402 411 414 426 433 443 448 454 464 470 477 484 487 490 496 505 509 510 522 528 537 542 549 553 559 563 570 574 582

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 448 (76.98%)
Unidentified 82 (14.09%)
National Lab 17 (2.92%)
Industry 16 (2.75%)
Unemployed 8 (1.37%)
Educational - Pre-College 7 (1.2%)
Government Agency 4 (0.69%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 174 (44.85%)
in INDIA 97 (25%)
cn CHINA 36 (9.28%)
de GERMANY 17 (4.38%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 14 (3.61%)
br BRAZIL 12 (3.09%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 10 (2.58%)
fr FRANCE 10 (2.58%)
bd BANGLADESH 9 (2.32%)
ir IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF 9 (2.32%)

Simulation Runs

2,768

58 76 121 151 199 222 240 261 283 304 357 405 425 452 469 513 538 555 565 580 605 643 679 716 733 749 779 792 849 877 923 951 976 1076 1108 1371 1461 1510 1524 1551 1575 1589 1602 1620 1654 1683 1708 1720 1734 1753 1774 1785 1814 1836 1904 1920 1947 1976 2005 2074 2098 2118 2140 2269 2428 2460 2476 2511 2538 2564 2604 2629 2642 2658 2676 2706 2746 2768
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 1.98 hours 124.45 days
CPU time 0.91 seconds 22.98 minutes
Interaction Time 11.92 minutes 12.52 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.