Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

MIT Tools for Energy Conversion and Storage

By Jeffrey C Grossman1, Joo-Hyoung Lee2, Varadharajan Srinivasan3, Alexander S McLeod3, Lucas Wagner4

1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2. Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Korea 3. University of California - Berkeley 4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Atomic-Scale Simulation Tools to Explore Energy Conversion and Storage Materials

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.4 - published on 22 Apr 2013

doi:10.4231/D32V2C94N cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "MIT Tools for Energy Conversion and Storage" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

437

36 47 50 57 66 78 88 98 106 113 122 133 144 157 161 173 189 197 204 213 224 232 234 239 244 252 257 262 271 282 288 293 301 305 313 320 328 334 337 344 351 357 364 370 371 375 379 383 385 391 397 400 410 414 424 427 428 434 437

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 342 (78.26%)
Unidentified 54 (12.36%)
Industry 15 (3.43%)
National Lab 13 (2.97%)
Educational - Pre-College 5 (1.14%)
Unemployed 5 (1.14%)
Government Agency 3 (0.69%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 185 (61.06%)
in INDIA 52 (17.16%)
cn CHINA 12 (3.96%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 12 (3.96%)
bd BANGLADESH 10 (3.3%)
ca CANADA 8 (2.64%)
tw TAIWAN 7 (2.31%)
fr FRANCE 6 (1.98%)
de GERMANY 6 (1.98%)
it ITALY 5 (1.65%)

Simulation Runs

1,228

153 322 346 364 381 407 423 434 450 461 472 489 508 526 543 559 588 600 615 627 647 670 672 683 692 705 712 722 738 761 772 783 797 806 823 836 860 878 883 908 935 955 1032 1042 1043 1054 1067 1074 1081 1092 1120 1133 1152 1160 1187 1210 1212 1223 1228
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 1.31 days 261.5 days
CPU time 1.69 minutes 5.63 hours
Interaction Time 14.96 hours 124.66 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.