Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Resources › Tools › Piece-Wise Constant Potential Barriers Tool › Questions
This resource has a 10.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 02 Jan, 2012
Users: 595
Jobs: 9756
Avg. exec. time: 38 secs
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE
Avg. Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Advanced
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

NCN Supported

670 user(s), detailed usage

71 users in 10 class(es)

0 Citation(s)

12 questions (Ask a question)

1 review(s) (Review this)

6 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Piece-Wise Constant Potential Barriers Tool

By Xufeng Wang1, Samarth Agarwal1, Gerhard Klimeck1, Dragica Vasileska2, Mathieu Luisier1, Jean Michel D Sellier1

1. Purdue University 2. Arizona State University

Transmission and the reflection coefficient of a five, seven, nine, eleven and 2n-segment piece-wise constant potential energy profile

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.2.7 - published on 17 Dec 2010

doi:10254/nanohub-r4826.19 cite this

This tool is closed source.

First-Time User Guide View All Supporting Documents

Ask a question about this tool Recent Questions

Recent Questions (12) Ask a question about this tool
986 How is the k (horizontal location for green dots) calculated?
Asked by Brian E Faulkner @ 05:32 PM on 16 Mar 2012 • Open • 0 		0 Like
844 Is it working for triangular barrier?
Asked by Anonymous @ 02:58 AM on 28 Jul 2011 • Open • 0 		0 Like
260 what does the tool improvement of version 1.1.9 really mean?
Asked by Anonymous @ 07:05 PM on 07 Apr 2009 • Closed • 1 		0 Like
257 the lattice constant for tight binding should be really used in the generation of the heterostructure
Asked by Anonymous @ 05:05 PM on 02 Apr 2009 • Closed • 2 		0 Like
256 Effective mass variation in pcpbt is not working correctly for tight binding
Asked by Anonymous @ 04:57 PM on 02 Apr 2009 • Closed • 2 		0 Like
222 the tight binding calculations do not yet allow for a change in effective masses
Asked by Anonymous @ 10:53 PM on 24 Feb 2009 • Closed • 3 		0 Like
170 single barrier choice results in no output
Asked by Anonymous @ 10:48 AM on 06 Nov 2008 • Closed • 1 		0 Like
164 compare a tight binding calculation to the analytical expansion methodin this tool
Asked by Anonymous @ 11:09 AM on 30 Oct 2008 • Closed • 2
163 for 100 barriers the resonance finder has some problems
Asked by Anonymous @ 11:04 AM on 30 Oct 2008 • Closed • 1 		0 Like
162 Feedback about the progress in the resonance finding would be great -
Asked by Anonymous @ 11:02 AM on 30 Oct 2008 • Closed • 1 		0 Like
153 transmission and reflection coefficients on exchanged axes
Asked by Anonymous @ 10:30 AM on 07 Oct 2008 • Closed • 1 		0 Like
152 the tool does not create transmission coefficients for a single barrier case
Asked by Anonymous @ 09:56 AM on 07 Oct 2008 • Closed • 1

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies.