Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Perfect Absorber Metamaterial simulator › Usage
This resource has a 0.0 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 22 Jul 2014
Users: 54
Jobs: 567
Avg. exec. time: 3 mins
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0

54 users, detailed usage

0 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Perfect Absorber Metamaterial simulator

By sainath motlakunta1, Bala Krishna Juluri2

1. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 2. Pacific Integrated Energy Inc

perfect absorber matametrial

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.0 - published on 11 Jun 2013

doi:10.4231/D3TQ5RD63 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Perfect Absorber Metamaterial simulator" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

54

6 8 8 13 14 19 23 30 38 44 47 49 52 54

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 33 (60%)
Unidentified 18 (32.73%)
Government Agency 1 (1.82%)
National Lab 1 (1.82%)
Unemployed 1 (1.82%)
Industry 1 (1.82%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 12 (41.38%)
in INDIA 6 (20.69%)
cn CHINA 4 (13.79%)
cz CZECH REPUBLIC 1 (3.45%)
tw TAIWAN 1 (3.45%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 1 (3.45%)
br BRAZIL 1 (3.45%)
nz NEW ZEALAND 1 (3.45%)
tr TURKEY 1 (3.45%)
de GERMANY 1 (3.45%)

Simulation Runs

567

99 103 103 119 121 160 276 313 439 512 530 555 563 567
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 3.94 hours 60.81 days
CPU time 2.62 minutes 16.16 hours
Interaction Time 39.16 minutes 10.06 days

No classroom usage data was found. You may need to enable JavaScript to view this data.

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.