All Purdue clusters (Coates, Rossmann, Hansen, Carter, and Conte) are scheduled for downtime on March 15 and 16, 2014. Tools that use these clusters will not execute simulations. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Quantum Dot Lab › Usage
This resource has a 8.8 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 13 Mar 2014
Users: 4811
Jobs: 55678
Avg. exec. time: 8 secs
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 14
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Intermediate
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

NCN Supported

659 users, detailed usage

1415 users in 128 classes

14 Citation(s)

20 questions (Ask a question)

12 review(s) (Review this)

3 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Quantum Dot Lab

By Gerhard Klimeck1, Lars Bjaalie2, Sebastian Steiger1, David Ebert1, Tillmann Christoph Kubis1, Matteo Mannino1, Michael McLennan1, Hong-Hyun Park1, Michael Povolotskyi1

1. Purdue University 2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Compute the eigenstates of a particle in a box of various shapes including domes and pyramids.

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 2.1 - published on 27 Jan 2011

doi:10.4231/D3B27PR0Q cite this

This tool is closed source.

First-Time User Guide View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Quantum Dot Lab" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

4,811

46 91 143 180 273 341 378 445 480 508 540 584 675 707 746 804 924 975 1,011 1,041 1,064 1,092 1,126 1,158 1,179 1,209 1,249 1,359 1,406 1,465 1,488 1,509 1,528 1,545 1,571 1,625 1,648 1,663 1,682 1,730 1,829 1,883 1,902 1,929 1,948 1,960 2,011 2,037 2,081 2,108 2,139 2,191 2,292 2,376 2,418 2,458 2,488 2,526 2,569 2,622 2,697 2,778 2,825 2,884 2,963 3,080 3,133 3,176 3,207 3,230 3,268 3,323 3,397 3,428 3,469 3,515 3,594 3,643 3,672 3,710 3,746 3,763 3,789 3,836 3,940 3,976 4,012 4,066 4,147 4,221 4,264 4,312 4,350 4,365 4,401 4,425 4,552 4,614 4,672 4,716 4,811

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 3,600 (74.63%)
Unidentified 705 (14.61%)
Industry 151 (3.13%)
National Lab 100 (2.07%)
Educational - Pre-College 88 (1.82%)
Educational - Unspec. Level 64 (1.33%)
Unemployed 53 (1.1%)
Government Agency 33 (0.68%)
Personal 17 (0.35%)
Military 13 (0.27%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 1,908 (60.46%)
cz CZECH REPUBLIC 331 (10.49%)
in INDIA 316 (10.01%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 183 (5.8%)
de GERMANY 88 (2.79%)
cn CHINA 82 (2.6%)
ca CANADA 74 (2.34%)
gb UNITED KINGDOM 61 (1.93%)
co COLOMBIA 59 (1.87%)
br BRAZIL 54 (1.71%)

Simulation Runs

55,678

127 249 376 559 943 1288 1635 2045 2282 2460 2588 2772 3794 4001 4191 4696 6125 6385 6691 6850 7157 7288 7478 7752 8223 8366 8596 10015 10936 11873 12052 12196 12379 12768 13425 14196 15274 15563 15734 16352 17633 18131 18291 18426 18497 18594 18941 19128 19367 19691 19885 20166 20981 21919 22158 22657 22891 23128 23656 24232 24830 29467 29720 30139 30889 32032 32298 32699 32902 33088 33497 34732 35623 38551 38758 39137 39952 40470 40783 40966 41202 41398 41524 42290 43311 44557 44819 45102 45750 46951 47344 47763 48071 48145 48469 48685 50431 53552 53963 54588 55678
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 3.75 hours 5936.76 days
CPU time 7.72 seconds 3.37 days
Interaction Time 46.74 minutes 1226.12 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.