Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

SIESTA

By Lucas Wagner1, Jeffrey C Grossman2, Joe Ringgenberg3, Daniel Richards3, Alexander S McLeod4, Eric Isaacs5, Jeffrey B. Neaton5

1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 3. University of California, Berkeley 4. University of California - Berkeley 5. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Use SIESTA to perform electronic structure calculations

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 2.0.1 - published on 01 Feb 2011

doi:10.4231/D3N87300P cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "SIESTA" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

691

16 21 28 34 41 44 44 48 53 56 58 66 70 74 76 79 89 93 99 106 114 120 137 144 153 163 175 189 199 205 209 219 244 257 272 296 311 321 334 350 363 369 389 398 424 438 470 494 508 527 536 545 556 562 577 588 605 620 633 641 645 651 656 665 676 691 691

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 473 (68.25%)
Unidentified 148 (21.36%)
National Lab 37 (5.34%)
Industry 18 (2.6%)
Government Agency 8 (1.15%)
Unemployed 5 (0.72%)
Educational - Pre-College 2 (0.29%)
Military 2 (0.29%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 175 (47.43%)
in INDIA 76 (20.6%)
cn CHINA 26 (7.05%)
es SPAIN 16 (4.34%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 15 (4.07%)
de GERMANY 14 (3.79%)
ca CANADA 13 (3.52%)
br BRAZIL 12 (3.25%)
it ITALY 11 (2.98%)
dz ALGERIA 11 (2.98%)

Simulation Runs

4,629

79 90 105 136 150 154 157 167 189 194 199 223 230 254 260 288 323 348 376 515 551 652 791 809 824 865 949 1005 1039 1057 1088 1139 1252 1310 1357 1503 1554 1586 1630 1689 1747 1769 1843 1879 2021 2060 2156 2277 2363 2405 2427 2456 2484 2527 2621 2725 2824 3061 3240 3281 3415 3449 3475 3756 4314 4629 4629
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 4.7 hours 519.49 days
CPU time 24.39 minutes 44.91 days
Interaction Time 1.5 hours 166.28 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.