Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Thermoelectric Power Factor Calculator for Superlattices › Usage

Thermoelectric Power Factor Calculator for Superlattices

By Terence Musho1, Greg Walker2

1. West Virginia University 2. Vanderbilt University

Quantum Simulation of the Seebeck Coefficient and Electrical Conductivity in 1D Superlattice Structures using Non-Equilibrium Green's Functions

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.2 - published on 29 Jun 2009

doi:10.4231/D35Q4RK7J cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "Thermoelectric Power Factor Calculator for Superlattices" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

464

13 18 37 44 47 55 62 63 70 76 78 80 89 91 93 100 108 117 127 130 132 134 144 154 158 164 170 176 185 193 199 205 210 214 227 243 249 255 259 263 269 275 282 285 287 290 296 299 301 319 330 336 340 347 349 353 363 371 374 378 382 388 407 420 425 428 433 437 445 449 456 462 464

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 322 (69.4%)
Unidentified 104 (22.41%)
Industry 18 (3.88%)
National Lab 8 (1.72%)
Educational - Pre-College 5 (1.08%)
Unemployed 5 (1.08%)
Government Agency 2 (0.43%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 134 (50%)
in INDIA 51 (19.03%)
cn CHINA 19 (7.09%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 16 (5.97%)
ca CANADA 10 (3.73%)
cz CZECH REPUBLIC 10 (3.73%)
de GERMANY 8 (2.99%)
br BRAZIL 7 (2.61%)
tw TAIWAN 7 (2.61%)
jp JAPAN 6 (2.24%)

Simulation Runs

1,517

52 66 121 141 146 188 227 242 257 269 272 274 298 306 310 325 352 381 435 442 473 478 503 543 554 582 597 608 635 651 666 693 765 787 824 892 903 912 926 937 954 967 976 1043 1046 1051 1067 1081 1084 1126 1157 1169 1179 1188 1193 1267 1282 1298 1304 1310 1316 1329 1370 1417 1424 1428 1455 1461 1476 1490 1507 1515 1517
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 2.07 hours 64.48 days
CPU time 4.8 minutes 2.5 days
Interaction Time 32.27 minutes 16.79 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.