Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › SugarCube › Usage
This resource has a 7.8 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 10 Dec 2013
Users: 145
Jobs: 594
Avg. exec. time: 47 secs
Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 4

41 users, detailed usage

1 users in 1 classes

4 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

SugarCube

By Jason Clark1, Prabhakar Marepalli1

1. Purdue University

A tool for ready-made MEMS

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 0.05 - published on 23 Jul 2010

doi:10.4231/D3QR4NQ4Z cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Usage

World usage

Location of all "SugarCube" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

145

5 9 11 15 18 20 23 29 32 33 37 40 46 49 51 54 57 59 59 63 67 67 69 72 87 88 92 94 95 97 98 102 104 105 106 110 128 133 134 135 138 139 139 144 144 145

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 96 (66.21%)
Unidentified 32 (22.07%)
Industry 11 (7.59%)
Unemployed 3 (2.07%)
Educational - Pre-College 1 (0.69%)
Government Agency 1 (0.69%)
National Lab 1 (0.69%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 47 (47.47%)
pk PAKISTAN 21 (21.21%)
in INDIA 16 (16.16%)
de GERMANY 6 (6.06%)
tr TURKEY 2 (2.02%)
jp JAPAN 2 (2.02%)
tw TAIWAN 2 (2.02%)
fr FRANCE 1 (1.01%)
vn VIET NAM 1 (1.01%)
af AFGHANISTAN 1 (1.01%)

Simulation Runs

594

31 37 41 50 61 63 77 106 116 124 131 137 167 183 203 211 216 219 219 224 254 254 265 279 346 359 378 386 394 397 400 413 418 422 430 442 510 540 542 546 556 568 571 592 592 594
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 1.29 days 135.18 days
CPU time 46.58 seconds 1.36 hours
Interaction Time 2.38 hours 10.43 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.