Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › nanoJoule › Usage

nanoJoule

By Yang Zhao1, Eric Pop2, Feifei Lian2

1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2. Stanford University

This tool performs a self-consistent simulation of the current-voltage curve of a metallic single-wall carbon nanotube with Joule heating.

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 1.2 - published on 19 Aug 2014

doi:10.4231/D3KP7TS1P cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "nanoJoule" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

350

12 18 29 35 39 42 45 53 58 69 77 84 85 88 91 100 106 111 115 121 126 132 135 138 144 148 152 156 165 173 177 182 186 194 199 208 213 219 224 226 227 228 235 241 243 251 256 258 260 264 269 272 274 279 283 289 292 295 299 302 306 306 306 310 314 319 321 327 328 332 338 339 340 341 343 343 347 349 350

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
Educational - University 277 (79.14%)
Unidentified 38 (10.86%)
National Lab 13 (3.71%)
Industry 11 (3.14%)
Unemployed 6 (1.71%)
Educational - Pre-College 4 (1.14%)
Government Agency 1 (0.29%)
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
us UNITED STATES 123 (49%)
in INDIA 69 (27.49%)
cn CHINA 13 (5.18%)
jp JAPAN 9 (3.59%)
kr KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 8 (3.19%)
bd BANGLADESH 7 (2.79%)
ca CANADA 6 (2.39%)
it ITALY 6 (2.39%)
de GERMANY 5 (1.99%)
es SPAIN 5 (1.99%)

Simulation Runs

2,557

194 231 322 360 367 383 394 416 442 504 666 688 691 705 710 756 781 832 843 879 917 948 955 1168 1240 1285 1333 1356 1400 1432 1442 1457 1477 1508 1535 1601 1615 1640 1699 1705 1706 1722 1750 1788 1832 1864 1892 1899 1903 1913 2004 2037 2045 2059 2109 2119 2124 2136 2143 2155 2161 2166 2168 2177 2193 2203 2260 2290 2296 2331 2347 2421 2422 2442 2445 2486 2541 2555 2557
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 1.03 hours 75.35 days
CPU time 2.78 seconds 1.36 hours
Interaction Time 29.36 minutes 35.89 days

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.