On Monday July 6th, the nanoHUB will be intermittently unavailable due to scheduled maintenance. All tool sessions will be shut down early in the morning. Home directories and tools will be unavailable most of the day. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. close

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

[Illinois]: Two leaky integrators in series

By Lisa Sproat1, John Feser1, Jessica S Johnson1, NanoBio Node1

1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Implements a model having two units (leaky integrators) in series, each with recurrent, excitatory self-connections allowing the units to exert positive feedback on themselves

Launch Tool

Session invocation is currently disabled.

Version 1.4aw - published on 18 Mar 2015

doi:10.4231/D3P55DH71 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

    SCREENSHOT #1 SCREENSHOT #2 SCREENSHOT #3

Category

Tools

Published on

Abstract

This tool simulates the network responses of two neurons connected in series, in which both neurons exert positive feedback on themselves. The neural network is configured so that unit 2(y2) receives input from unit 1(y1) and unit 1(y1) receives an input from outside the network. A schematic of the system can be viewed in the tool.

/resource_files/2013/05/18181/2560/image.png

FIGURE 2.2 Shows two leaky integrators in series. Both units y1 and y2 send excitatory, recurrent (positive feedback) connections to themselves with weights w11 and w22, respectively. Unit y1 receives input x from outside the network, with weight v1, while unit y2 receives input from unit y1 with weight w21. Note that unit y2 does not also receive input x.

Sponsored by

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Lisa Sproat; John Feser; Jessica S Johnson; NanoBio Node (2015), "[Illinois]: Two leaky integrators in series," http://nanohub.org/resources/twoleakseries. (DOI: 10.4231/D3P55DH71).

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.