Please help us continue to improve nanoHUB operation and service by completing our survey - http://bit.ly/nH-survey14. Thank you - we appreciate your time. close

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

VEDA: Virtual Environment for Dynamic AFM

A suite of dynamic AFM simulators for air/liquid/vacuum on soft or hard samples.

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 2.1.12 - published on 31 Oct 2014

doi:10.4231/D32R3NX9S cite this

Open source: license | download

View All Supporting Documents

Usage

World usage

Location of all "VEDA: Virtual Environment for Dynamic AFM" Users Since Its Posting

Simulation Users

1,738

6 6 7 26 37 63 79 87 99 112 120 134 145 170 183 204 218 231 247 301 313 330 344 354 359 374 389 417 433 468 486 493 503 526 544 551 559 569 584 639 658 680 688 698 709 724 739 753 762 777 791 845 881 887 902 910 920 924 940 955 982 1,003 1,027 1,090 1,114 1,123 1,135 1,152 1,167 1,273 1,318 1,334 1,344 1,352 1,373 1,435 1,456 1,469 1,482 1,503 1,514 1,522 1,534 1,541 1,550 1,562 1,576 1,626 1,646 1,663 1,674 1,688 1,700 1,713 1,736 1,738

Users By Organization Type
Type Users
No data found for the month of 2014-11
Users by Country of Residence
Country Users
No data found for the month of 2014-11

Simulation Runs

41,118

71 108 142 232 315 497 605 655 683 743 835 914 1029 1105 1305 1412 1478 1537 1670 3626 3693 3975 4171 4336 4461 4912 5152 5575 5916 6210 6339 6455 6545 6666 6930 7301 7417 7535 7742 8377 8465 8552 8588 8614 8723 8800 9026 9249 9410 9537 9606 9798 10069 10140 10238 10317 10404 10451 10509 10579 10693 10817 11024 11429 12126 12861 13374 13522 13870 18174 20470 23275 24028 24302 24589 27134 29925 30236 30671 31798 32593 32722 32997 33248 33538 34088 34246 36096 37545 38463 38699 39233 39589 40211 41041 41118
Overview
Average Total
Wall Clock Time 2.56 hours 2995.41 days
CPU time 3.35 minutes 65.36 days
Interaction Time 51.52 minutes 1004.21 days

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.