SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE - nanoHUB.org will be completely unavailable on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 from 7AM EST (12:00 UTC) to approximately 6PM EST (23:00 UTC) for significant hardware and software upgrades. Please plan accordingly and watch this space for further information. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 
Home › Tools › Virtual Kinetics of Materials Laboratory : Spinodal Decomposition › Reviews
This resource has a 8.6 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 09 Dec 2013
Users: 200
Jobs: 606
Avg. exec. time: 8 mins
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Intermediate-Advanced
Difficulty Level Target Audience
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 K-12 Middle/High School
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Easy Freshmen/Sophomores
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Intermediate Juniors/Seniors
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Advanced Graduate Students
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 Expert PhD Experts

Learn more ›

200 users, detailed usage

3 users in 3 classes

0 Citation(s)

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (Add a new wish)

Virtual Kinetics of Materials Laboratory : Spinodal Decomposition

By Michael Waters1, R. Edwin Garcí­a2

1. University of Michigan 2. Purdue University

Applies the Classic Cahn-Hilliard Equation to Simulate the Chemical Segregation of Two Phases (2D)

Launch Tool

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 0.1.1 - published on 18 Aug 2008

doi:10.4231/D32804Z16 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

See also

No results found.

Recommendations

No results found.

Powered by ...

Reviews

Write a review

No reviews found. Be the first to review this resource!

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.