Navigation

Support

Support Options

Knowledge Base

Find information on common issues.
Ask the Community

Ask questions and find answers from other users.
Wish List

Suggest a new site feature or improvement.
Support Tickets

Check on status of your tickets.

Submit a Support Ticket

Username: optional Name: required E-mail: required Please answer the question: required
Eye, ankle or arm: which is part of the head? Please leave this field blank. required

Problem: required Attach a screenshot: optional (.jpg, .jpeg, .jpe, .bmp, .tif, .tiff, .png, .gif, .pdf, .zip, .mpg, .mpeg, .avi, .mov, .wmv, .asf, .asx, .ra, .rm, .txt, .rtf, .doc, .xls, .xlsx, .html, .js, .wav, .mp3, .eps, .ppt, .pptx, .pps, .swf, .tar, .tex, .gz, .dat, .docx, .xml, .m)

Home › Tools › Virtual Kinetics of Materials Laboratory : Spinodal Decomposition › Reviews

Virtual Kinetics of Materials Laboratory : Spinodal Decomposition

By Michael Waters¹, R. Edwin García²

1. University of Michigan 2. Purdue University

Applies the Classic Cahn-Hilliard Equation to Simulate the Chemical Segregation of Two Phases (2D)

You must login before you can run this tool.

Version 0.1.1 - published on 18 Aug 2008

doi:10.4231/D32804Z16 cite this

This tool is closed source.

View All Supporting Documents

This resource has a 8.6 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Total: updated 16 Jan 2015
Users:	256
Jobs:	965
Avg. exec. time:	6 mins

Reviews & Citations
Avg. Review:	0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations:	0

Intermediate-Advanced

Difficulty Level		Target Audience
	K-12	Middle/High School
	Easy	Freshmen/Sophomores
	Intermediate	Juniors/Seniors
	Advanced	Graduate Students
	Expert	PhD Experts

256 users, detailed usage

12 users in 4 classes

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

0 wish(es) (New Wish)

Reviews

No reviews found. Be the first to review this resource!

Get Help

Get Involved

Legal

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.