Support

Support Options

Submit a Support Ticket

 

Tags: Tight Binding Modelling

All Categories (1-9 of 9)

  1. Electronic Structure Theory of Dilute Impurity Alloys: GaBiP and GaBiAs

    18 Jan 2013 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): M. Usman

    We report an atomistic model established for electronic structure calculations of GaBiAs (0 < Bi < 12%) alloys based on empirical tight binding parameters. Alloy supercells consisting of 1000 and...

    http://nanohub.org/resources/12371

  2. Empirical Tight-binding Parameterization of SmSe in the sp3d5f7s* model

    26 Mar 2013 | Downloads | Contributor(s): Zhengping Jiang, Marcelo Kuroda, Yaohua Tan, Dennis M. Newns, Michael Povolotskyi, Timothy Boykin, Tillmann Christoph Kubis, Gerhard Klimeck, Glenn J. Martyna

    The Empirical Tight Binding(ETB) method is widely used in atomistic device simulations. The reliability of such simulations depends very strongly on the choice of basis sets and the ETB...

    http://nanohub.org/resources/17369

  3. Gerhard Klimeck

    Gerhard Klimeck is the Reilly Director of the Center for Predictive Materials and Devices (c-PRIMED) and the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) and a Professor of Electrical and...

    http://nanohub.org/members/3482

  4. Heeyuen Koh

    http://nanohub.org/members/56621

  5. Muhammad Usman

    Muhammad Usman was graduated from the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department of Purdue University in August 2010. His PhD thesis was theoretical modelling and simulations of InGaAs/GaAs...

    http://nanohub.org/members/9702

  6. Quantum Dot based Photonic Devices

    01 Apr 2012 | Online Presentations | Contributor(s): Muhammad Usman

    Deployment of nanometer-sized semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) in the active region of photonic devices such as lasers, semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOA's), photo-detectors etc. for the...

    http://nanohub.org/resources/13532

nanoHUB.org, a resource for nanoscience and nanotechnology, is supported by the National Science Foundation and other funding agencies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.