-
distorted Miller plane views?
Open | Responses: 1
First of all, congratulations for the tool. I'm trying to have my students using it for visualizing crystal surfaces, and wanted to compare the fcc-(100) and bcc-(100). They should both show a square …
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/885
-
I can't see any images.
Open | Responses: 1
The program seems like it runs when I click simulate, but where I'm supposed to be seeing the image all I get is grey. I have access to all of the options on the right hand side.
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/867
-
Can you customize the basis?
Closed | Responses: 1
Is there a way to create and visualize a crystal that isn't already pre-packaged, i.e. use an existing lattice with a custom basis? I want to visualize the crystal structure shown here: …
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/574
-
how do i see the plane?
Closed | Responses: 1
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/472
-
about distance
Closed | Responses: 1
hii, how can I view the distance between the nearest-neighbour atoms in a bcc lattice?
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/357
-
how do we see other crystal orientations for instance for silicon, (557),?
Open | Responses: 1
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/346
-
open surface problem
Open | Responses: 2
- I am not convinced that the surfaces that are computed now are actually correct. The bond connections do not look right.
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/310
-
I would like to see a Hexagonal closed packed crystal but where is that? Do you have it?
Open | Responses: 2
Thank you for the tool.
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/308
-
In addition to the unit cells, can you also show larger chunks of the crystal
Open | Responses: 3
The tool could be dramatically improved if not only the unit cells were shown, but also multiple unit cells to form a larger chunk of the crystal. It would also be great to be able to see different …
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/228
-
Bravais lattice viewer shows very small atoms and very long bonds.
Open | Responses: 2
The tool could benefit in its visibility if the bonds were made smaller just like the fix that has happened with the graphene lattice, that is now showing properly.
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/226
-
Orthorhombic and Tetragonal unit cells are not properly displayed.
Open | Responses: 2
Orthorhombic and Tetragonal unit cells are not properly displayed. They both seem to appear just like cubic cells.
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/225
-
Si and GaAs structure appear to be on different scales or different origins.
Open | Responses: 2
It is hard to compare the two materials as the origin is shifted out of the field of view. Can get this get fixed?
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/105
-
graphene unit cell representation shows very small atoms
Open | Responses: 2
when the graphene material system is displayed as a unit cell the carbon atoms are really small. In the diamond lattice or the bucky ball that is not the case. Can this get so the atoms are more …
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/104