
schred1.0 does not account for doping/Temp effects on VFB in DG
Closed  Responses: 0
I do not noticeable changes when using intrinsic 1E10cm3 or heavily doped 1E18cm3 in simulation of metalDG structures. The same happens when changing temprerature
I would excpect...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1650

I am confused regarding the Material Parameter Inputs. The notation in the input deck is extremely confusing.
Closed  Responses: 1
The input deck has mx_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley 3), my_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley 3), mz_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley 3), mhh_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1294

Can i use it for graphene FET simulation to calculate potential distribution in one dimension?
Closed  Responses: 1
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1207

SCHRED Compilation
Closed  Responses: 2
I would appreciate if somebody gives me instruction for SCHRED compilation in windows.
I also have an ORACLE Virtualbox and I could compile it there, if I knew how.
Thanks in advance.
Lui
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1172

Schred v1: other materials
Closed  Responses: 1
In Schred V1 there is an option for “other” materials. When this is selected I can input effective masses and band offsets.
How is this different from Schred V2, which asks...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1169

simulating InAs in Schred V1 vs V2
Open  Responses: 1
In version 2, I tried the following parameters for InAs:
Lvalley energy offset: 0.73
Xvalley...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1168

x5 larger Ctot than Cox in QM schred V2
Open  Responses: 2
Hello,
I found that the QM with Fermistatistics in Schred V2 gives five times larger Ctot than Cox when I have tox=0.73 nm and NA=7e18 (and other parameters as defaults except I changed...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1164

Boltzmann statistics does not work
Open  Responses: 2
I tried baltzmann statistics for QM or SC. Both did not work.
Could you please fix it?
Thank you
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1160

Including bulk doping when simulating QM accumulation capacitance in Schred V1
Closed  Responses: 1
Through examination of the source code I have figured out that I need to use the “accumula=yes” flag in the “calc” section of the input file to get Schred V1 to include...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1097

Schred V2: Simulating ntype substrates and Vfb determination
Closed  Responses: 1
Using the compiled Schred V2 code and supplied sample input files I am able to successfully model structures with a uniformly doped ptype Si substrate. I assume that to model an ntype...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1068

Input file syntax for Schred V2
Open  Responses: 1
I have downloaded and compiled the source code for versions 1 and 2 of Schred. However, I am having trouble finding information on the input file syntax for version 2. The...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1066

How to find Vox = f(Vg)
Closed  Responses: 0
I used this SHRED before to generate Vox=f(Vg)of a MOS, as Vg is swept from V to +V, but am struggling to find the way of how to do it with this new interface.
thanks,
Huy
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1006

Parameters for GaAs
Closed  Responses: 2
I just wondering the parameters or the refernce for calculation of GaAs in Schred.
Including the orientation,...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/791

How to simulate DGMOS with schred 2.0 tool?
Open  Responses: 1
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/709

Exactly same subband energies for 2 ladders
Closed  Responses: 1
I am simulating DG MOSCAP with Metal gates.
Doping7e18
Metal1 and 2 WF – 4.3eV
Voltage – 0 to 4 V
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/617

schred running ok?
Closed  Responses: 0
The CV for very thin oxide (considering only G vs considering GLX) on GaAs seems to be exactly similar. Which...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/387

Schred for non uniform doping?
Open  Responses: 1
Is there support for non uniform doping profile for Schred? I’m interested in using inverse modeling of CV to extract the doping profile. I have a situation of a very shallow N+ region...
http://nanohub.org/answers/question/151

ABACUS  Assembly of Basic Applications for Coordinated Understanding of Semiconductors
16 Jul 2008  Tools  Contributor(s): Xufeng Wang, Dragica Vasileska, Gerhard Klimeck
Onestopshop for teaching semiconductor device education
http://nanohub.org/resources/abacus

Schred Tutorial Version 2.1
23 Jun 2008  Downloads  Contributor(s): Dragica Vasileska
This Schred tutorial [or User's Manual] is intended to help users of the Schred tool with the Rappture interface. Readers will find various examples for modeling singlegate and dualgate...
http://nanohub.org/resources/4796

Quantum Size Effects and the Need for Schred
23 Jun 2008  Downloads  Contributor(s): Dragica Vasileska
In this paper, we provide a historical overview of the observation of quantum effects in both experimental and theoretical nanoscale devices. This overview puts into perspective the need for...
http://nanohub.org/resources/4794