Support

All Categories (1-20 of 23)

1. Whether the version 2 do the quantum correction for hole in the accumulation region?

   Closed | Responses: 0

   I just want to ask that whether the version 2 do the quantum correction for hole in the accumulation region?(MOSCAP)When I check the total charge density, I found that the...

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1807

2. schred-1.0 does not account for doping/Temp effects on VFB in DG

   Closed | Responses: 0

   I do not noticeable changes when using intrinsic 1E10cm-3 or heavily doped 1E18cm-3 in simulation of metal-DG structures. The same happens when changing temprerature

   I would excpect...

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1650

3. I am confused regarding the Material Parameter Inputs. The notation in the input deck is extremely confusing.

   Closed | Responses: 1

   The input deck has mx_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley 3), my_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley 3), mz_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley 3), mhh_3valleys (valley 1, valley 2, valley...

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1294

4. Can i use it for graphene FET simulation to calculate potential distribution in one dimension?

   Closed | Responses: 1

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1207

5. SCHRED Compilation

   Closed | Responses: 2

   I would appreciate if somebody gives me instruction for SCHRED compilation in windows. I also have an ORACLE Virtualbox and I could compile it there, if I knew how. Thanks in advance. Lui

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1172

6. Schred v1: other materials

   Closed | Responses: 1

   In Schred V1 there is an option for “other” materials. When this is selected I can input effective masses and band offsets.

   How is this different from Schred V2, which asks...

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1169

7. simulating InAs in Schred V1 vs V2

   Open | Responses: 1

   In version 2, I tried the following parameters for InAs:

   L-valley energy offset: 0.73
   X-valley...

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1168

8. x5 larger Ctot than Cox in QM schred V2

   Open | Responses: 2

   Hello, I found that the QM with Fermi-statistics in Schred V2 gives five times larger Ctot than Cox when I have tox=0.73 nm and NA=7e18 (and other parameters as defaults except I changed...

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1164

9. Boltzmann statistics does not work

   Open | Responses: 2

   I tried baltzmann statistics for QM or SC. Both did not work. Could you please fix it? Thank you

   http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1160

10. Including bulk doping when simulating QM accumulation capacitance in Schred V1

    Closed | Responses: 1

    Through examination of the source code I have figured out that I need to use the “accumula=yes” flag in the “calc” section of the input file to get Schred V1 to include...

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1097

11. Schred V2: Simulating n-type substrates and Vfb determination

    Closed | Responses: 1

    Using the compiled Schred V2 code and supplied sample input files I am able to successfully model structures with a uniformly doped p-type Si substrate. I assume that to model an n-type...

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1068

12. Input file syntax for Schred V2

    Open | Responses: 1

    I have downloaded and compiled the source code for versions 1 and 2 of Schred. However, I am having trouble finding information on the input file syntax for version 2. The...

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1066

13. How to find Vox = f(Vg)

    Closed | Responses: 0

    I used this SHRED before to generate Vox=f(Vg)of a MOS, as Vg is swept from -V to +V, but am struggling to find the way of how to do it with this new interface.

    thanks,

    Huy

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/1006

14. Parameters for GaAs

    Closed | Responses: 2

    I just wondering the parameters or the refernce for calculation of GaAs in Schred. Including the orientation,...

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/791

15. How to simulate DGMOS with schred 2.0 tool?

    Open | Responses: 1

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/709

16. Exactly same subband energies for 2 ladders

    Closed | Responses: 1

    I am simulating DG MOSCAP with Metal gates. Doping-7e18
    Metal1 and 2 WF – 4.3eV Voltage – 0 to 4 V http://nanohub.org/answers/question/617

17. schred running ok?

    Closed | Responses: 0

    The CV for very thin oxide (considering only G vs considering GLX) on GaAs seems to be exactly similar. Which...

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/387

18. Schred for non uniform doping?

    Open | Responses: 1

    Is there support for non uniform doping profile for Schred? I’m interested in using inverse modeling of CV to extract the doping profile. I have a situation of a very shallow N+ region...

    http://nanohub.org/answers/question/151

19. ABACUS - Assembly of Basic Applications for Coordinated Understanding of Semiconductors

    5.0 out of 5 stars 

    08 Aug 2008 | Tools | Contributor(s): Xufeng Wang, Dragica Vasileska, Gerhard Klimeck

    One-stop-shop for teaching semiconductor device education

    http://nanohub.org/resources/abacus

20. Schred Tutorial Version 2.1

    0.0 out of 5 stars 

    23 Jun 2008 | Downloads | Contributor(s): Dragica Vasileska

    This Schred tutorial [or User's Manual] is intended to help users of the Schred tool with the Rappture interface. Readers will find various examples for modeling single-gate and dual-gate...

    http://nanohub.org/resources/4796