nanoHUB: Use of External Resources by External Researchers
Search
- Version 1
- by (unknown)
- Version 3
- by (unknown)
Deletions or items before changed
Additions or items after changed
1 | - | [[Image(cntbundle.gif, 360, class=align-left)]]
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | - | |||
3 | [[Image(kureshihasan.gif, 360, class=align-left)]] | |||
4 | ||||
5 | The analysis of our external literature citations revealed some examples where external | |||
6 | theory-driven researchers utilized a nanoHUB tool that has been contributed to nanoHUB | |||
7 | from outside of the NCN. For example the authors Kureshi and Hasan working at a | |||
8 | university in India published their study CNT bundles as possible copper replacement | |||
9 | interconnects in the “Journal of Nanomaterials” in April 2009. In their work they utilized | |||
10 | the tool “Carbon Nanotubes Interconnect Analyzer (CNIA)” for over 1,600 simulations in | |||
11 | the year 2009 alone. CNIA was contributed by Tanachutiwat and Wang of the University | |||
12 | of Albany. We cannot see any relationship between the two research groups and NCN | |||
13 | other than the contributed, efficiently served, and utilized tool CNIA. The same CNIA | |||
14 | tool has previously also been cited in a Master’s thesis at the University of Cincinnati in | |||
15 | 27 the year 2005. The concept of community contributions coming from outside the NCN | |||
16 | and being useful for an unrelated research group is becoming reality. | |||
17 | ||||
18 | [[Div(start, class=clear)]][[Div(end)]] |